The tag service=alley is a very odd way to describe way/120282236 which is correctly described as highway=unclassified is it not?

It is very definitely closed and part of the construction site although the building looks to be being retained.

Where precisely did you source the care home details from?

Cheers Phil

Has way/1034146531 reopened?

It closed several years ago and last time I went by it was boarded up.

Cheers Phil

Ignore it?
I had never even noticed it :)

Just wondering why you have removed the wikidata tag from Northwood?

Please do not add cartpaths to public highways, leisure centres of carparks.

OSM should only reflect what is in the real world.

Rubbish removed.

Hi, this is not a charity shop, why did you change it?

Cheers Phil

Hi, in this changeset you have mapped a path way/982094029 which is causing rather a lot of concern on @talk-gb.

I am wondering what sources you used, have you walked it or were you using some other source?

Cheers Phil

Brownfield is for land that has previously been developed and the development is then cleared.
When, or if, development starts then it will become construction.
However that will need a survey, we cannot copy from planning applications.

You used a source which is a breach of copyright, we absolutely must not copy from other maps

We are not allowed to use the OS Mapping which is included in the planning application site. The copyright statement at the bottom of the map makes that very clear.

We have no complete, opendata, source of addresses at this level in the UK. The only way to gather address data is to go out and survey, which takes time. Some of the addresses you have added are not publicly accessible, the sections of Lowe Hill Road are not residential but at best service roads/shared driveways, with private access.

I have reverted this edit.

Hi
Welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit however please keep your changesets to sensible areas. This one should have been three, one for each area.
Also please use meaningful changeset comments which describe your intentions, uhh just made me immediately question your edits.

OSM is a database which reflects verifiable real world information, a doestic garage with an operator and and an operator:type of quango is certainly questionable.

Sorry, realised that you didn't change the noticeboard.

5. Advertising on the noticeboard by the library is prohibited, amenity=notice_board

Hi, you have made several errors in this changeset.
1. Wem's Kitchen is a takeaway, why would you change it to a restaurant?
2. Monks is a shop, not an office. It has big windows and displays which are useful outside of opening hours,
3: Why have you removed the tunnel from Maypole Court to High Street?
4. Wishing Well is two separate buildings, deliberately mapped that way as part of a plan for 3d mapping.
The office and training room should be separate buildings and objects.

Cheers Phil

I have updated the POI with its current name / fhrs / website.

Again I do not believe this is a foodbank.

c/o in the address suggests this is an admin contact.

locations,geojson does seem to be rather more sane than foodbanks.geojson and suggests that the foodbank is at the Salvation Army. But again is just a postcode centoid, not an actual location and is pointing at the wrong building.

Cheers Phil

Hi, I am fairly certain this is not the location of a foodbank or if this is actually 157. It appears to simply be a postcode centoid.

Cheers Phil

It appears that this location is the postcode centoid of the postcode given on the website, however the website is very clearly wrong giving totally the wrong postcode.

I have moved the location of the POI to a more sensible location and have removed to erroneous

Hi Brian
The location of the foodbank looks to be quite a way out.

What source did you use as based on the address I would not have put it here.

Cheers Phil