Your colleague has just reverted this error on my advice yet you have just repeated it.

What evidence do you have to suggest that my survey is incorrect?

Hi, I am not sure what you have actually fixed here. All you seem to have done is made some QA tool warnings go away?

The 'fixes' you have made have not actually fixed anything. The postcodes you have changed are not complete and you have simply removed the prompt the local mapper had left to prompt him to come back when he has more information to add.

Cheers Phil

Hi pjij
The reason I was asking is that you moved the start of the oneway back to the junction with Park Avenue. When I surveyed it, it started further along allowing cars to turn from the driveway of the first house to turn left along Porthill Road.

Cheers Phil

However this is OSM and we follow the rules and consensus of the community.

junction=roundabout?uselang=en#Ref_Tagging

Where did you discuss this change?

Hi, your changeset comment says "Corrected Roundabout", what exactly did you correct?

You seem to have removed the ref tags however, why?

Cheers Phil

Just wondering why you made this change?

What source are you using?

Hi Mathilde
Thank you for your edit, it looks good.

You may want to change the construction landuse to commercial and it would be really useful if you could add the access roads so that satnavs will direct drivers to turn at the right place.

Cheers Phil

I believe that this tag should be openplaques:id rather than openp.

Cheers Phil

Hi Kev
Are you able to comment on note/2392787 ?

There is some slightly odd use of living street, which probably should be traffic calming and the name close suggest there should only be access at one end.

Cheers Phil

Hi Tom, this edit has just come to my attention as a user who needs to deliver to this area is questioning if motor vehicles are really not allowed here. Imagery suggests they are.

I am just wondering what you were trying to achieve here? highway=pedestrian with appropriate access tags to allow for deliveries. Using footway in this situation is very odd.

Also please use meaningful changeset comments that describe what you are doing, this implies that you have only added what was missing and not made major changes to routing.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong.

You seem to have deleted Wimpy and combined it with Lloyds pharmacy, just wondering what you were trying to achieve.

I have reverted this part of the change.

Cheers Phil

Hi, I realise this change was a while back but in this change you broke the Leicestershire Round relation.

It is important to ensure that previously mapped data is seen and retained, and new updates added around them.

I have fixed this.

Cheers Phil

Bore da
The source you have used for this edit appears to not be compatible with OSM.

Firstly the source opens with a page which uses Google maps which is clearly not compatible with OSM.

Secondly the terms and conditions of the site state that use is for personal use only, adding to OSM which allows use for any purpose is clearly not personal.

Please review the terms and conditions of the sites you are using as a source to ensure that they are compatible with OSM before making any further remote edits.

Any edits which use sources not compatible with OSM should be reverted.

Diolch Phil

Name fixed

Hi, thank you for your edit and for spotting the not traversable mini-roundabout. However it should be mapped as highway=roundabout. I don't think junction=circular is even a thing?

Cheers Phil

In the countries where those languages are spoken I would expect to see the Wikipedia tags pointing to articles in those languages. The languages you have listed are not the languages of Wales.

Wikipedia can do what it likes however this is about openstreetmap tagging and osm handles these tags just fine.

IMHO the tags wikipedia:en and wikipedia:cy and equally valid and have the advantage that a native who wishes to read about their country in its native should not have to go to wikipedia via a foreign language.
As Colin says, just because it is in the wiki doesn't make it so.

The wiki is intended to document mapping practice, not dictate it.

Thank you Richard

Hi
Just wondering why you changed Glenfield Social Club to a bar? It was correctly mapped as a Social Club which more accurately describes what it is and implies you cannot simply walk in.

They are a very common feature in most UK towns and villages.
See amenity=social_club although our mapping of them is often a bit lacking unfortunately.

Cheers Phil

These crossings are part of a traffic light controlled junction, they are certainly not pelicans. Pelicans are on demand crossings for pedestrians and most notably have a flashing green man/amber phase.

Cheers Phil