I don't think way/833630805 extends to the middle of the road.

Cheers Phil

Fixed in changeset/89045457

Fixed in changeset/89045457

Please see my comments made in changeset/89031345

Cheers Phil

The parts that are still there is a difficult one, I did use waterway-derelict_canal for way/260667327 and way/260667329 where there is still water, but since then both the wiki and rendering have been changed.

Cheers Phil

I don't think the barrier is here.

Bing imagery shows the connection to The Parade much narrower, and there are no give way markings.

OS Opendata Roads shows that there is no road connection beyond the houses facing the parade. There is a service which runs along the front of the houses connected to King Edmund Street.

Narrow connection to The Parade is probably a cycleway.

Cheers Phil

Hi
Much of the railway you have added as railway=abandoned is through cropped fields and isn't actually recognisable as a former railway.
using railway=razed would be a far more accurate tag to use.
What source did you use?

Cheers Phil

That is way way/332753916

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong, the ways you have tagged as The Shropshire Union Canal are not canals, they are more drainage ditches.
Cheers Phil

Thank you

ps I would tend to have gone with motor_vehicle=no bus=yes which allows foot/cyclists and doesn't exclude horses

Cheers Phil

Hi, the access you have added here has gone a little wrong.

The problem with adding access=no is that it can have unintended consequences, for example here you have excluded pedestrians which is clearly an error.

Also as there are no give way markings at the junction with Groby Road, and it is narrow, suggests that this is probably oneway. The bus stop on the left tends to confirm this.

Cheers Phil

Hi, please take care when editing around existing data.

The service road you have added should clearly join to the existing track, not to the bridleway.

Also the section you have added should be tagged as access=private as there is no public right of way between the bridleway and the existing public road.

Cheers Phil

Hi, not 100% sure but is this really a residential road?

It is very unlikely that a road has been missed, there is nothing on OS Opendata or visible on imagery.

Cheers Phil

Hi Colin
Have fixed them now.

Cheers Phil

Hi Colin
You are right. I did not intend to change these parishes, in fact I wasn't intending to touch any relations.

I will see if I can work out what I did and fix them when I get home.

Cheers Phil

Thank you
The name does seem redundant to me as that is on the overall bus station but routes start from a particular stop within the bus station so mapping them is useful to help passengers find the right stop.

Cheers Phil

Hi, just wondering why you have removed the bus_stop tags?

Many users and applications use them, not to mention OSM carto.

Please restore them.

Cheers Phil

No reply so have restored objects.

Reverted