Please respond to changeset comments before you keep changing tags which may break the database for other users.

You appear to be engaged in an edit war.

If you believe the tagging is incorrect then please discuss it with the community.

Some of your comment, such as the system imply you are working for someone and are covered by a directed editing policy, your user description should cover this.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.

The name you have added to the building is unnecessary and could cause confusion

The name Boreton Park is already on the outline of the grounds, making this name a duplication, I am also not sure that it is called PGL Children's Residential Trips, is it really only for children?

Cheers Phil

Hi
Just wondering why you have changed these tracks to footways, are they now narrower than when they were originally surveyed?
Also if they are no longer tracks, then track associated tags such as tracktype, motor_vehicle etc no longer make sense.

If you have any questions or need any help then please feel free to ask.

Cheers Phil
Ch

Hi, whilst changing objects mapped as nodes to building ways is a good thing to do. Please be careful not to create duplications such as leaving the existing node in place.
Cheers Phil

Also highway=bridleway is a very UK specific term, which many routers do not understand.
Removing access tags from bridleways has resulted in these being bypassed by foot/bicycle routers.

Hi, what is the source you are using to tag these legal restrictions?

There are only two such legal restrictions visible on bing streetside?

Maybe there should be only two relations?

Cheers Phil

I would agree with gurglypipe, a bridleway should be tagged as foot/horse=designated.

For some reason the correct tagging was removed as unecessary in changeset/65891774

The tag vehicle=no is also a bit misleading, it should be motor_vehicle=no, a bicycle is legally a vehicle and allowed to use a bridleway.

And please add meaningful changeset comments that give other mappers an idea of what you are trying to achieve. Hashtags are meaningless as primary comments. Aviva is an insurance company.

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.

When editing please take care and observe existing features. Here you have crossed an existing right of way withou connecting them.

Cheers Phil

Hi, should these highway=construction have some sort of node connecting them to the existing rights of way network?

Cheers Phil

Hi, what evidence do you have to suggest that this is no longer a track?

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Has this building been demolished?

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just wondering why you have removed this driveway, which is verifiable on the ground and was added to improve deliveries to those premises?

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In OSM we add things that exist and are verifiable on the ground. There is certainly not a weird shaped building in the quarry.

This is vandalism and certainly should receive no credit as part of a uni project.

I am reverting this edit.

I have restored the splits to the roundabout and kept the circularisation.

Cheers Phil

I can go through and revert the merge if that will help.

The other reasons for splitting roundabouts is lane count and destination, and occasionally turn restrictions.

Cheers Phil

Hi
I have changed these to public footpaths as they have been dedicated as footpaths on the basis it is a simpler process.

It is likely that the bridleway people will now apply for them to be upgraded as bridleways, so will monitor events.

Cheers Phil

Hi, just wondering why you have been merging roundabouts into single ways?

This and others I have looked at had been split to correctly model the paths taken by bus routes. These changes need to be undone to restore the routes correctly.

If you need any help doing this then please ask.

Cheers Phil

My observations of amazon edits are leading me to believe that the GPS is not connected to the vehicle, but is contained in the handheld unit on which the driver ask the recipient to sign.

When making edits based on gps traces please consider the the driver may have been walking for the last part of the trace.

In this case it is highly likely that the trace through the schoolyard was on foot.

Cheers Phil