Location : osm.org/edit?changeset=70895603#map=19/52.70831/-2.50074
The residential road ends at this point, beyond that the narrow service road can be seen. Certainly not something I would drive into without prior knowledge of turning places.
See http://trigpoint.myzen.co.uk/photodump/LeicesterWay.jpg

Location: osm.org/edit?way=694540800#map=18/51.76245/0.06186
I have not been here, but clearly a private car park for a business. So more a parking aisle with private access.

Location: osm.org/edit?way=694458204#map=19/51.41103/0.52687
This looks like a new build, so correctly mapped as residential. Too new to be on our opendata tiles.
Cheers Phil

Why have you deleted Porthcawl, a rugby pitch and some traffic lights?

Why have you deleted these objects?
A residential area?
A church?

Hi, welcome to OSM.
It always concerns me when a new users first contribution to OSM is to delete objects that other mappers have taken the time to add. Please can you explan why you have deleted these tracks and farmyards?
Also it is helpful to other mappers if changeset comments are meaningful, dvr used doesn't tell me anything about your intentions.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please remember that OSM is a live database and anything added will be available to all users immediately. Please only add genuine data, not test data. A wood is never a single node and is clearly wrong in this location so I am reverting this edit.
Please continue to edit, but only add things that exist on the ground.
Cheers Phil

Hi, thank you for your edit however you have added your business in the middle of the road, which is a bit unlikely.
I am removing this but as long as it is verifiable, has visible signage, then please add it back in its correct position.
Cheers Phil

I would just draw the loop, it is private land so there is no formal turning loop.
Cheers Phil

Hi, yes simply add the turning loop although as its private there will not be any oneway needed.

Cheers Phil

Thank you.
However you should have something on your profile that explains what you are doing and links to your wiki page. As do Amazon, Kaart, Mapbox etc.
At the point of asking the first question I had no idea your edits fell within the organised editing policy.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit however it has gone a bit wrong.
The restriction was mapped about two years ago, and whilst maybe a bollard or short section of cycleway should be added motor vehicles will not be instructed to turn between New College Road and Wenlock Road as there are turn restriction relations which allow bikes.
There is no ban on motor vehicles using New College Road.
Please do not SHOUT.
I have reverted this and added the bollards/cycleway although was a bit puzzled as to how to accurately map what is lowered kerb to allow bikes to cross the pavement and the mapped turn restriction had made that not a priority.
Cheers Phil

Hi, a mini roundabout is a bit of an odd thing to map at the end of a private driveway?

Cheers Phil

Please reply using the changeset comment feature to keep discussions visible to the community.
PM recieved
"Here’s all you need to know about Tidbo. www.tidbo.com"

However that does not explain what #tidbo has to do with editing OSM but it does suggest that you should be following the directed editing policy.
Please see https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Directed_Editing_Policy
Cheers Phil

What does TIDBO mean?

Hi, please could you keep your changes to smaller areas, at least single countries. This covers most of the planet and is hard to see where the changes are.
Cheers Phil

?????

Please take into account existing data, edits such as this degrade the quality of OSM.
If you are adding parking aisles please spend a little more time to at least adjust the adjust the existing car park to match.
Cheers Phil

Again you (as in Amazon) are making exactly the same errors of assuming residential roads are missing that were correctly mapped.
You (as in Amazon) are ignoring comments previously made that if there is a public residential road here it would have been mapped.
See comments made in changeset/70388919
changeset/70232266
changeset/70383697
Here I can clearly see the cahnge in roadsurface and turning areas at the end of the previously mapped Leicester Way and again this is confirmed on OS Opendata.
Cheers Phil

Again look at the existing map, You have again crossed a footpath without creating a join and ignored the iD error.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone very wrong.
Firstly this appears to be a private shared driveway, not a public residential road. A residential road in the middle of the countryside is highly unlikely, especially when it leads into an area with temporary buildings.
You have also failed to take any account of existing data. This way crosses a footpath which you have not joined, iD gives a clear warning but you have ignored it. You have also taken no account of a hedge and 3 fences that the way passes though.
Also creating a routable public link in this way is dangerous, assume it is private. A map user could very easily assume this is a shortcut to the footpath and be very disappointed.
Cheers Phil

Referring to way/693691365