This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset changeset/184715437

This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset changeset/184715437

Bore da Cerys
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

I am wondering what the source of your edits are? In the case of this one you quoted a pdf, but what licence was that released under and are we allowed to use it?
I am also wondering what your motivation is as all of your edits are speed limits all over the country.

Diolch Phil

That github is private, please can you either make it public or send them to data@openstreetmap.org with the subject [Ticket#2026041510000782]

Cheers Phil

I have reverted and redacted the objects added in 181454614.

When you are ready to continue please post to the UK Forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86

We will need to see any supporting evidence of licensing, such as the emails received not just your word that someone said something.

Cheers Phil

Hold off at the moment as I am waiting to hear from other DWG members .

Cheers Phil

Thank you for your response.
A Reddit thread has been pointed out to me in which you mentioned using Google Maps.
For the avoidance of doubt use of Google Maps in Openstreetmap is absolutely not allowed and any changes involving it will need to be reverted.
Cheers Phil

Hi Parkmoto
Phil from the Data Working Group with a few questions.
Where was this import discussed with the Openstreetmap community?
You should be following the import guidelines as pointed out by spiregrain.
You use the word we which suggests you are not just an individual working alone.
What explicit licence is this data released under?
Cheers Phil

This change is also bizarre as you have only removed foot and bike access but left horse as designated.

Cheers Phil

Bore da
I am very confused by this one. You have started with a footway with no access tags, on which a router will only route foot traffic. The changeset is "Not a public right of way - Eryri National Park Authority" but rather than restrict foot traffic you have allowed bikes.
What are you trying to achieve?

Diolch Phil

Hello
What legal evidence do you have that the Right of Way has been extinguished?
I can find no recent path orders for Maugersbury so please can you find evidence supported by the highway authority.
As it stands the access tags you have added and designation/prow_ref contradict each other.

Also horses are allowed but pedestrians are not?

Cheers Phil

Hello
What legal evidence do you have that the Right of Way has been extinguished?
I can find no recent path orders for Maugersbury so please can you find evidence supported by the highway authority.
As it stands the access tags you have added and designation/prow_ref contradict each other.

Cheers Phil

What is the source of this edit. A local has never seen any signs or heard of it
Have you actually been here?

Hello James
Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution.
A couple of pointers for the future
Roundabouts are tagged as junction=roundabout, there is no need to add oneway tags.
The spurs maintain the highway classification, they should not be tagged as _link.
Hope this is helpful.
Cheers Phil

Hi
Please add meaningful changeset comments to describe what you are doing to your fellow mappers.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Cheers Phil.

So your solution is to add another fake crossing?

Pedestrians can cross the road wherever they like. Drawing decorative sidewalks just adds unnecessary complications to pedestrian routing. We do not have, or want oppressive jaywalking rules.

Cheers Phil

No pedestrian actually follow this route to get from the pub to the Spar osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=52.939181%2C-4.141642%3B52.939257%2C-4.141277#map=19/52.938975/-4.141400

Hello
These changesets have made pedestrian routing worse.
The pavement is only separated from the road by kerbs and a pedestrian will just cross the road, after following the normal rules. They should not be sent on a long diversion to a crossing. Especially where there are none in the real world.
Have you actually visited Tremadog and surveyed these crossings? What is the source of these crossings?
Because I can't spot them. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=241065118038134

Cheers Phil

I am certainly no wiki expert so am not able to work out where any discussion of depreciating this tag took place or if there was any.

Thank you for your response but firstly remember that the wiki should always be taken with a large pinch of NaCl. Just because something has been written in the wiki it is not an authorisation to remove a tag from the map.