Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

No problem. Andy Townsends maps show relation names along with prow_ref which are useful for rights of way in England and Wales, carto misses these things.

Cheers Phil

Hi Ceirios
The names of long distance footpaths are not put on the individual ways. They belong on the route relation, which already exists in this case. These way also form part of The Wales Coastpath relation.
relation/77964

Cheers Phil

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

Hola
Phil del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos aquí.

Sus ediciones han sido marcadas como sospechosas y, al investigar, he descubierto que ha eliminado un gran número de edificios.

Por favor, no lo hagas, es una falta de respeto a otros mapeadores cuyo trabajo y tiempo estás desperdiciando. Por favor, mejore el mapeo existente, no elimine los objetos que existen.

Voy a revertir tus eliminaciones.

Hello
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Your edits have been flagged as suspicious and on investigation I have found that you have deleted a very large number of buildings. Please do no do this, it is disrespectful to other mappers whose work and time you are throwing away. Please improve exiting mapping, do not delete objects which exist.

I will revert your deletions.

Hi
Surveying objects for OpenStreetMap is fine, if you are there and capture a GPS trace, that is the gold standard and you should use that in OSM.
We can also use out of copyright OSM maps, which are available as leyers in josm.
What we cannot do is use premium OS maps as these are not opendata and your usage is only licenced for personal use, which mapping in OSM is not.

Hope this helps.

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Hi
Which OS maps have you used as a source for these edits?

Cheers Phil

Hello
Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits, I am however concerned as to why you have added maxheight=below_default to way/1352970613 ? This is a major road (former ring road) and has no sign so surely this should be default?

Cheers Phil

Hi hlo281
We do not update the map for closures as short a this one. Many consumers only take data periodically so unless a closure is measured in months the map shouldn't be updated.

Tenho alguns comentários sobre este conjunto de alterações.
Em primeiro lugar, você desenhou uma praia dupilcada, uma praia duplicada em cima de uma praia existente, que ignora as características existentes.
Em segundo lugar, o nome parece improvável e é potencialmente ofensivo. Este é um nome real ou algo que certos indivíduos o chamam. O conselho local aprova.

I have a couple of comments on this changeset.
Firstly you have drawn a dupilcate beach a duplicate beach on top of an existing beach which ignores existing features.

Secondly the name seems unlikely and is potentially offensive. Is this a real name or something certain individuals call it. Does the local council approve.

Cheers Phil