Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your addition, however Greenfields Rec was already correctly mapped as a recreation_ground. Your park was a duplication which I have removed.
Please ask if you need advice on adding information to OSM.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. The area around a church should be tagged as a churchyard. It is not likely to be a park. That seems to be mistagging.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for correcting the position of the Admiral Duncan, although we only map the building where it is, I have tidyed this up and mapped the car park. The beer garden isn't exactly a park so I have retagged it.
The village green can be tagged as a village green, no need to mistag as a park and I have retagged the area with the football pitches as a recreation ground as that is a more accurate tag. I have removed the back garden park, I guess that was a mistake.

Hi, please can you point me to where these changes, and the others in the series, were discussed?
Thanks Phil

I am reverting this as it is spam.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your addition of a footpath. It looks good.
As you are local I wonder if you could check the legal access status of Vincents Roadm it has previously been tagged as access=permissive which looks a little odd.
Thanks Phil

Please don't do that, it is better to keep these discussion in the open.
Thanks Phl

Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit looks very odd, what is the source you are using.
It seems very odd to map mud around jettys.
Also please could you use meaningful changeset comments describing what you have done so that other mappers know what you are intending. #thamesmapathon tells us nothing.
Thanks Phil

Please see comments on note note/650624
The spelling does not match OS Opendata Locator or local tradition.
Thanks Phil

What do you mean by label? What are you expecting

Hi Bernard, you have missed sport=soccor

Cheers Phil

Another undisguised mass edit, with no explanation. And you are still ignoring mappers comments.

And what are you actually fixing, and please map in smaller areas so that you don't waste mappers time trying to work out which of the 6 pages are in their area.

Hi, FP20 is a public right of way reference and should be put in the prow_ref tag, rather than the name. The name tag is for names.
It is certainly not FP20 for the majority of its length, it obviously isn't a Leicestershire right of way reference.
It also needs a bit more, I doubt it is Derbyshire FP20, if it was then the numbers are going to get silly by the time you get to Glossop. It should have either have the parish name, or however the highway authority refer to it. This is probably Melbourne FP20.
By the way, what is the source of this reference?
Cheers Phil

You should revert them. they are spam. Shout up if you need any help.

Hi, welcome to OSM. What does ref:sponsored mean?

No response received so I am reverting this change

Shop is probably the wrong description, made_made=works, product=industrial_lasers would fit better I think.
You will need to use a proper computer based editor, such as iD, rather than maps.me as it only allows a very limited subset of pre-defined tags to be used.

Thank you Mike, they sound a useful thing to add. If you change them to natural=tree, you probably need a new node so you have one for each tree, then tag them as natural=tree then they will show on the map.
You can add species:en=oak, maybe species:cy if you can.
natural=tree
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
The correct way to tag a a postcode is addr:postcode rather than the name tag. I am not sure what Wy Wyri is, but the middle of the road is an odd place, postcodes normally apply to places where mail is delivered to, and maybe use addr:housename.
Trees are mapped as natural=tree, there is no need to use the name tag unless the tree really is named.
Shout up if you need any help.
Cheers Phil