OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
173864903

This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037

173864916

This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037

173864919

This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037

174621377

Bench position corrected

173951894

Is this verifiable?

Maybe OHM, not something that belongs in OSM which should be thing that are there now.

Cheers Phil

174086113

Hello
You seem to have combined a solar panel with a bus stop, what were you aiming to achieve?

Reverted in changeset/174102378

174086100

reverted in changeset/174102378

116885614

No problem.
But remember that any proposal is just that and should be taken with a large pinch of NaCl as there is a good chance it will not happen.

Cheers Phil

168254609

Hello
Phil from the Data Working Group here.
We have received from some mappers who are concerned by the use of the Nerf Map Editor.
For the avoidance of doubt an editor which providing links to disallowed sources, in this case streetview, is prohibited and any edits made using such an editor will need to be reverted.

WE understand you are possibly the developer?

If so please could you comment on the purpose of the edit and the decision to include such functionallity?

Also displaying the speed limit from other sources is not allowed in an OSM editor.

167762520

Also displaying the speed limit from other sources is not allowed in an OSM editor.

167762520

Hello
Phil from the Data Working Group here.
We have received from some mappers who are concerned by the use of the Nerf Map Editor.
For the avoidance of doubt an editor which providing links to disallowed sources, in this case streetview, is prohibited and any edits made using such an editor will need to be reverted.

WE understand you are possibly the developer?

If so please could you comment on the purpose of the edit and the decision to include such functionallity?

116885614

Hello
I have removed this in changeset/173926066

It was only ever a proposal yet you made no mention of this in the changeset description and tagged it as an active area causing issues for data users.

Adding planned stuff into OSM is controversial at best, especially when the idea is controversial in itself.

Cheers Phil

161078661

So what brings #Youthmappers to Manchester?

Did you visit?

Cheers Phil

160489977

Hi
Just wondering why way/1344694712/history/1 and a few others are tagged as layer -1?

Cheers Phil

76773673

Hi Merzof
Any idea still why you added 5 79 Oxford Roads with different postcodes?

Cheers Phil

160175955

I have removed this footway because after going for a walk I found it is a private area.
It is certainly artificial but its not intelligent.

Cheers Phil

159634256

Hello
I am puzzled as to why way/1338100284 is on layer -1?

Cheers Phil

171051932

Hello
Thank you for your edit.

Unfortunately barrier=yes isn't very effective for blocking routers as it is prottey vague, it nay be gate or a stile which are passable.

After a survey I have updated them to barrier=fence.

Cheers Phil

160175955

Also note note/485337 suggests it doesn't exist.
Maybe you should have visited when you went walkabout

160175955

Really? way/1341839495/history/1 is a sidewalk?
Cheers Phil