This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

Hola
Phil del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos aquí.

Sus ediciones han sido marcadas como sospechosas y, al investigar, he descubierto que ha eliminado un gran número de edificios.

Por favor, no lo hagas, es una falta de respeto a otros mapeadores cuyo trabajo y tiempo estás desperdiciando. Por favor, mejore el mapeo existente, no elimine los objetos que existen.

Voy a revertir tus eliminaciones.

Hello
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Your edits have been flagged as suspicious and on investigation I have found that you have deleted a very large number of buildings. Please do no do this, it is disrespectful to other mappers whose work and time you are throwing away. Please improve exiting mapping, do not delete objects which exist.

I will revert your deletions.

Hi
Surveying objects for OpenStreetMap is fine, if you are there and capture a GPS trace, that is the gold standard and you should use that in OSM.
We can also use out of copyright OSM maps, which are available as leyers in josm.
What we cannot do is use premium OS maps as these are not opendata and your usage is only licenced for personal use, which mapping in OSM is not.

Hope this helps.

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Hi
Which OS maps have you used as a source for these edits?

Cheers Phil

Hello
Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits, I am however concerned as to why you have added maxheight=below_default to way/1352970613 ? This is a major road (former ring road) and has no sign so surely this should be default?

Cheers Phil

Hi hlo281
We do not update the map for closures as short a this one. Many consumers only take data periodically so unless a closure is measured in months the map shouldn't be updated.

Tenho alguns comentários sobre este conjunto de alterações.
Em primeiro lugar, você desenhou uma praia dupilcada, uma praia duplicada em cima de uma praia existente, que ignora as características existentes.
Em segundo lugar, o nome parece improvável e é potencialmente ofensivo. Este é um nome real ou algo que certos indivíduos o chamam. O conselho local aprova.

I have a couple of comments on this changeset.
Firstly you have drawn a dupilcate beach a duplicate beach on top of an existing beach which ignores existing features.

Secondly the name seems unlikely and is potentially offensive. Is this a real name or something certain individuals call it. Does the local council approve.

Cheers Phil

Hi
What is the purpose of removing tags from the way and creating a node?

They are better on the way.

Cheers Phil

Hello Towig
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

We are not allowed to use the Warrington planning maps as they are copyright and we do not have permission to use such data.

Cheers Phil

Hi Jonny
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Whilst you have answered a question with a question you have not answered the initial important question.

You are using an editor called YourAppName, which others have used (at least an editor with the same name)
resulting in breaking existing data.

What is YourAppName?, did you write it or where did you find it? Is it documented anywhere and why not use josm or iD?

Hi
Please can you explain what is incorrect about the node you removed?

Please use meaningful comment that describe the changes you have made and why so that other mappers can understand you changes.

Cheers Phil (OSMF Data Working Group)

Hi
Since when has this area been been part of Manchester?
Cheers Phil

Reverted, changing concrete and asphalt to paved is losing data.

And please keep your changeset comments precise and describe what you have changed. In this case 'Added a restaurant'. Mappers do not have to wade through a pile of spammy verbal diarrhea.

This has been reverted under Ticket#2024111610000074 — suspicious activity of user Edmonds College Plant Map. changeset/159202716

It was, the town still is Abermaw. Confused me when I first saw Y Bermo on the sign

Rugby League is a bit unlikely here, are you sure?

Cheers Phil

Hi
Are you sure about this edit. Do you have any evidence beyond 4 year old streetside imagery.

Streetside shows only a temporary restrictions, the temporary signs and the signs here https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=52.640128%7E-1.10771&lvl=18.8&pi=-14.9&style=x&mo=om.1&dir=148 suggest it was one of the temporary restrictions during covid for social distancing. It is very unlikely that this has been made permanent.

Cheers Phil

Thank you for your edit.

I have corrected the phonenumber to international format and website to https.

Cheers Phil