Thank you Mike, although now I am more confused as the road/bridge shown in your photo is not mapped?

The sign says "unsuitable for motor vehicles" which in osm should be motor vehicles=discouraged.

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1045307

Obviously only passable at low tide and it is up to drivers to assess their vehicle and conditions and not blindly follow their satnav.

What legal restrictions are there of trucks not being allowed to use this road?

The only visible signage is that motor vehicles can use it only for access which has been incorrectly mapped as motorcar and motor_cycle.

Truck is not a valid tag in osm however I have corrected the tagging to motor_vehicle=destination.

What sources are you using for this edit?

Is there a legal restriction here?

Why are 3.5t vehicles a special problem?

Again that should only be used if it is signed, but why would a router tell someone to do a U-turn and go back to where it came from?

Only if it is legally signed as having such a restriction. We do not add restrictions just because we think it's not suitable.

We can add physical restrictions such as the width to inform routers, but maxwidth should only be used if it is a legally signed restriction.

No response, reverted

How is the weird website you added for Wroxeter in any way related to Wroxeter?

Thank you for your reply however Wikipedia is not a valid source for OSM.

It it is not released under the correct license. The big question is where did Wikipedia get that information from.

What are you trying to achieve here? It's unusual to tag a no U-turn that goes back on itself.

It seems an odd place to find a legal turn restriction in a location such as this.

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/371992 and https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/372001 looks like a track and a ford to me

Please do not delete wikipedia and wikidata tags, that is vandalism.

Please do not delete wikipedia and wikidata tags, that is vandalism.

Wat's Dyke Way is already mapped as a relation, it is incorrect to duplicate that name on individual paths. That is not the name of the path, but of one of the routes that passes over it.

The names you have added seem unlikely, just because things can be translated doesn't mean they should be. Its unlikely many French, Spanish or Italians have even heard of it.

And the source of these names is?

Other than Shrewsbury and Yr Amwythig I have never seen any of these names in use.

In this case possibly, will need a survey which I will try this week.

Paving stones sounds a bit odd here as they are normally used outdoors.

I would expect some sort of tiles?

Cheers Phil

So what happens when, at least part of, this area becomes UTC+1 for most of the year?

Surely to be useful timezones are based on country/state boundaries?