Hi, just wondering if ref:gss has any purpose in osm. There appear to be several within the town, why this one? and what purpose do they serve? The areas have no geographic meaning and appear to have been drawn by a 2 year old.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however Rose Park appears to be someones back garden, please remember that we only map things that exist on the ground.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Priory Country Park is already mapped as a nature reserve. Adding a park over the top seems contradictory and doubles the name. Bing imagery seems to confirm it is not what we normally tag as a park.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, based on your description and aerial imagery this area is a recreation ground, rather than a park. I have changed it and added the playground.

Hi, welcome to osm. Something has gone a little wrong here, the building you have created is rather large and covers several streets. Would you like some help fixing it?

Hi Brian
Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, I agree that the hypens are not required, although you have made a small typo in the name.
Yout have used map.me to make the change, which is a bit Mickey Mouse when it comes to names. Your name has gone into name:en, which is a bit ironic.
If you could login to the OSM site and use the iD editor you will be able to correct the name tag and delete name:en.
Thanks Phil

Reverted and name added

Hi Tom
Thank you for your comments, that sounds like you have actually made these changes using your own knowledge, rather than just copied from another map. This is the kind of input we prefer, there is no need to justify what you know/have seen by quoting another source.
Thank you for your input.
Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM tagging is sometimes subtle, there is a difference between a park and a recreattion ground and all evidence suggests this is a recreation ground.
1. OS Opendata calls it a recreation ground.
2. Imagery shows a grassy area with pitches laid out, that definitely fits the wiki definition for a recreation ground.
Why is such a tiny tagging difference so important?

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your input however your comments make me a little wary. You state 'as per OS map', current OS maps are copyright and cannot be used in OSM and your lines do not match older out of copyright data.
When mapping rights of way we map the line as it exists on the ground, rights of way on an OS map are just an overlay and need to be taken as a rough guide rather than an actual line.
Also it is good to add a designation tag, designation=public_footpath, designation=public_bridleway to confirm your survey based on the coloured waymarks.
If you need any guidance just ask, Derby/Nottingham has a very active and knowledgeable community who can help too.
Cheers Phil

Reverted

I have reverted your changes and am trying to understand the problem. I can see that there is an issue with OSRM, but Mapzen works fine.
Will keep you posted.
Phil

Thank you Martin
I will sort it out.

Which router are you using?

Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Something little wrong.
You seem to have created a number of duplicate/overlapping ways on the southbound Blackwall Tunnel.
What were you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help?
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Please could you keep your edits to sensible areas. Edits like this are hard for other mappers to follow.
Thanks

??

Personal marker?

More personal markers?

These look like personal markers, what are you trying to achieve?

Hi, this looks a bit odd. What are you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help.