Thank you for adding this path. Unfortunately you have added it in the wrong place. There is a path between Haw Clough Lane and Bunkers, but it runs next to Morley cottage.

Having things missing from the map seems better than having confusing, incorrect details, so I have deleted this path in changeset/183199493.

Thank you for all your helpful mapping work: hopefully someone will add this path in its correct location before long.

I see you have fixed this in changeset/183038389 - thank you!

Thank you for all the work you do improving the map.

This changeset added a sidewalk way/1281142693 alongside Walpole Terrace way/4385605.

Walpole Terrace is tagged as "sidewalk=both" but now that you have mapped both sidewalks separately it needs to be "sidewalk:both=separate" as described at osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way.

Also it looks like you have not mapped any crossing which might lead to worse routing than if the sidewalks were not mapped separately.

Again, thank you for your work. Please take care to think of the consequences for existing features on the map when adding new features.

It briefly crossed my mind that perhaps there was another version of billiards I had never heard of, and I casually wondered how it might work, but it wasn't to be :)

As ever, thank you for your helpful work improving the map. This changeset added "food:dogs=£2.75" which seems like an unusual tag, but I know this pub is dog friendly so it doesn't seem unreasonable.

In changeset/182459059 @mueschel decided to delete this tag without discussion because "things like this happen accidentially just too often to write messages to everybody" so I thought I would check with you.

Okay, I think you're saying I correctly guessed that "food:dogs" is the "copy and paste error" I asked about, although you haven't explicitly stated this.

I know this pub is dog friendly and sells dog snacks, so maybe the tag was intended to convey that. However, https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:united-kingdom/keys/food:dogs shows this tag used nowhere else so perhaps it is a mistake.

Did you consider asking @SomeoneElse, who added this recently in changeset/182079192, what the tag was supposed to mean? I realise you might have already discussed it and I don't know about this.

What is the "copy and paste error" you removed? As far as I can tell you only removed "food:dogs=£2.75" which seems like a useful tag to me, not a copy and paste error.

Thank you for your helpful work improving OpenStreetMap. I suspect way/976487563 and way/976487564 are incorrectly tagged as historic=fort. Given their location perhaps bunker_type=pillbox would describe them better. What do you think?

Thank you for fixing these mistakes that were introduced in changeset/171889634.

That change introduced several other mistakes like this which I have fixed in changeset/182620552.

I have fixed these mistakes in changeset/182620552

I think you're right that it's a caterer rather than a cafe: I don't recall it opening regularly or often.

Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.

Please describe your changes accurately: the changeset description "added paths" is confusing for a change that adds two hedges and a garden.

Accurate descriptions make changes easier to review.

Thank you for improving the map.

I notice you edited node/4134208704, way/708996075, and way/708996079 that were already mapped.

This means there are three different things here named "Bear Pit" which seems against the spirit of osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element - how might we resolve this?

Hi, I suspect the "building=unspecified_building_typem" tag on way/1501457899 is a mistake - what tag did you mean to use here?

Thank you for all your good work improving the map.

In the spirit of osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only I have tagged four lime kilns you added with "name=Lime Kiln" in changeset/181325145. Please let me know if you think I haven't tagged these features appropriately.

Thank you for the prompt reply. I have made further improvements in changeset/181130646.

In future, when you add streets to the map, look at the e7xisting features nearby and fix them if necessary.

In this case, you have added two streets in the middle of a construction area: it's fairly clear that construction has finished but you didn't update that.

Again, thank you. :)

I've not walked along the footpath you added, but I think I've seen a "Public footpath" sign here when driving past.

Would "designation=public_footpath" and "foot=designated" make sense on way/1495135001?

Thank you for your work improving the map

There are a lot of changes here, and the two word description "Matlock Bath" isn't very helpful: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

From a quick review, I notice you added way/1495878991 which seems incorrectly tagged given building=terrace although I realise it's consisntent with the other terraced houses nearby.

As ever, thank you for your good work improving the map.

Please use helpful changeset descriptions to help reviewers understand your work. The one word "farm" is not enough.

I have mentioned this before at changeset/173146640, changeset/174989190, and changeset/174989830.

You have not responded to my previous comments asking for more helpful descriptions and continue this bad habit. Can you explain why?

Are you sure "highway=service" makes sense for the two roads you added? When I last visited this area, this area was a building site for a new housing estate, so I suspect "highway=residential" makes more sense. What do you think?