Hello David,

If you have local knowledge feel free to add the information on the map. I don't find on Open Street Cam tracks street signs, so I don't have a source to add the name.

Best regards,
Teodora

Hello,
I checked the road indicated by you. The name from local data is the same according to Tiger 2018. It was an error made by me. I corrected the road name. Thank you for made me aware about the situation.
Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Paul,

Thank you for the informations.

Thank you
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60677296

Right, i undestand your point of view. But according with the current situation ( until the stub will be usable) i thing that is is not oneway. My argument is that the oneway can not start from a node that doesn't connect yet with another node/way. When the link will be finished, than we could apply oneway tag, and then it will apply the role of a one-way link.

Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Paul,
Can you be more specific?

Hello Paul,

I reversed the changes.

Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Paul,

Acording to the sattelite imagery, that segment of road it isn't anymore under construction. For me, there is no logical explanation that the segment to be one way, because is a cul-de-sac way, so it should be both-way.
Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Chris,
Thank you for the informations. I will keep in mind.
Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Chris,

I saw that in this changeset you made links class mathc lower cross street. According to the Wiki, the links should have the upper class.
"The slip roads/ramps are usually considered to "belong" to the through highway they exit and enter. This is usually the higher classification of the intersecting highways because on and off ramps almost always have the same kind of restrictions as the main road [1], but in some cases this may be reversed."
See the link below: osm.wiki/Highway_link
Best regards,
Teodora

Hello UAN 51,
I corrected my edits. Thank you for letting me know about the edits.
Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Mike,
I deleted the link because I coudn't find any physical divider according to sattelite imageries ( Bing, Mapbox, Digital Globe). Anyway, I will reverse the changes. Thank you for letting me know that the edit is not desirable.
Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Gitne,
I will keep on mind.
Best regards, Teodora
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58253789

Hello Alister,

I added the geometry for the turning loop.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Alister,

Thank you for getting involved in making a good map.If you know from local knowledge I assume that your new updates in the area are correct.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Alister,

The source for the changeset is Bing Aerial Imagery.
About the Turnstyle Crescent, you were right. I corrected the mistake.
About the confusion for the road geometry, I updated based on satellite imagery ( I saw the configuration of the roads on the ground)
In wiki is a note :"Since most construction sites are not accessible to the public, it might be tough to get detailed GPS tracks of roads which have not yet been built. In that case, it's usually sufficient to roughly trace the route, and increase the detail level once the road is open."
On this sources I was confident that the roads that are under construction will be placed like this. In the situation that the roads will be located on other emplacements, that can be changed when the roads will be open as wiki suggests.
Here are the wiki pages that I used to take a decision about how it should be used the construction/proposed tags:
construction=*
proposed=*

Hello Alister,

I saw in Open Street Cam and Bing Aerial Imagery that in the area the construction site is in progress.
Because the tags were "proposed", and the roads are under construction, I updated the tag to "construction". Also I changed back to proposed the segments of road that intersect with the main roads (because it doesn’t start the construction on that segments according to OSC)
On wiki pages is mentioned that we can add construction tag: "to describe the type of the feature which is currently under construction”. For the tag proposed: "This key can be used for any feature that is still in planning phase but construction hasn't yet started. For features under construction use construction=* instead."
Here are the wiki pages that I used to be sure how to use construction/proposed tags:
construction=*
proposed=*

Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Alister,

I deleted the geometry for the turning loops and I replaced it with the tag: turning loop, as Wiki indicates: highway=turning_loop
After receiving your message, I verified the area and I corrected the unconnected footway.
About Cappela Drive, after checking satellite imagery (Bing Aerial Imagery, Digital Globe Standard Imagery and Esri Imagery) I observed that the road seems to be under construction actions. Also I modified the tag for Cappela Drive (from construction to proposed).

Best regards,
Teodora

Hello Gecho111,

I added the construction tag.
Best regards,
Teodora

Hi Bdustan,
I added the road Megawatt Drive because on Bing Aerial Imagery appear to be a road in use. I did a research and i didn't find a source to confirm that the Megawatt Drive is demolished, closed or realigned. (see http://www.clarington.net/en/live-here/resources/Roads-and-Sidewalks/Highway-407-Road-Closures-List.pdf).
If you know for sure that the road is demolished confirmed me and I will change. Or if you know from local knowledge feel free to update the OSM Data.
Best regards,
Teodora