Thanks Mate! I just couldn't figure it out. I couple of years ago I uploaded a set where many houses where tagged tainted=yes, which might have surprised the residents. Like your relation, it was intended to be for my own use only! (Tainted by association with inadmissible address data sources in case you were wondering)

What's this all about? There seem to be a lot more objects in relation/15601608 than might be expected? And that relation has no tags. Noticed it while looking at relation/15601608.

Thank-you! These were all my mistakes, I think.

Can this relation be deleted? This route seems to no-longer be publicised on the TfL website alongside the other Qxx and Cxx routes - neither as a current route nor a proposed route.

Hi there. Have you visited Wanstead Flats or looked at the satellite images or GPS traces? I do not beleive this path exists on the ground, and I'm sure the bridge you added does not. What is your source?

Thank you!

Oops! Thanks you. I don't think I made a habit of it!

Hi there.

In this changeset, you added a fixme to relation/138744: "needs working". I'm looking at the fixmes in my area - can you remember what you meant by this one, and how can it be resolved?

Regards,
Ken

Like this node - way/168227082/history

Hiya - for the quarterly project, I've looked at fixmes in this neighbourhood. What did you mean by "KR" in these fixme notes - as in "KR: access to here?" ?

Another one for luxiaghd, again pointing to problems in the automated processing - see node/10282554742. While it's possible to fix these by hand (seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130938743 ), it would be better if the #tflcid did not mess them up in the first place.

Looks good!

Do these new area sidewalks ever show up in the default osm.org rendering?

Hello - can you have a look at node/10282554684 , created in this changeset? It's stuck t the edge of a landuse=residential area, and it should be on the road, I assume. Please check your processes to avoid recurrence elsewhere.

Best thing would be to draw an area around the whole site, tagged with landuse=construction. Prefix the building and carpark and service roads with "disused:"

When they are demolished, change the prefix to "razed:". When the new builings appear add then as "building=construction". When they are finished and occupied, change to "building=residential" (or whatever). Finally, when the old buildings are no-longer visible on commonly used aerial images, remove them.

Always good to see reference numbers being added! I'm a fiend for postcodes and FHRS codes myself.

But congrats!

Your 10,000th edit!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129779299

Great, another one crossed-off!

How do you get to #156, then? is it through/under 154?

Thanks for this! And welcome to OSM.

I think this particular building will shortly be demolished to make way for new student flats. You might be able to find the details on pa.newham.gov.uk