OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
182209798

It's not an issue. The routes are available for cycling and foot traffic. It would be appropriate to make them bicycle designated and food designated.

However on the ground signage says that they are pedestrian priority. (Unless it's worn away or been removed in the last couple of years). I think that means it's not appropriate to mark them as highway=cycleway.

What sort of cycleways would have pedestrian priority?

182209798

Hi there. From memory, these paths are marked pedestrian priority at all entry points to the park. is these a reason you've changed them to cycle paths?

180738420

Oh - your bluesky post confirms this!

180738420

I didn't actually make it out there this weekend - suffering from a sore foot at the moment. I've been watching the surprising amount of progress around Bridgewater Bridge from the Liz Line. It looks as if the footpath between Iron Bridge and the Greenway is going to be open soon too (if is isn't already) with benches and landscaping.

180738420

(what happened to require a police cordon, I mean)

180738420

any idea what happened? I might be able to get over there tomorrow and have a look.

181692301

Good work and thank you for it. If you paln to do more of this sort of thing, don't forget about the Import Guidelines osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

It's great to see OGL data being identified and brought into the database.

181692301

Hi and welcome to OSM. A couple of quick questions on this changeset. 1. Did you check to see whether the motorcycle parking spaces were already present on OSM? (Is there a risk that your additions have doubled the number of spaces in TH?) 2. What do you know about who can use the spaces? You've said "fee=no", but are they open to everyone (access=yes) or is there a permit scheme, or are they residents only?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181692301

181642663

Thanks. I've added a level= tag to the new node in Changeset #181660690, just 'cuz.

I think it wouldn't be a problem is the rooms were the same shape and location on each floor, but here they're splayed about all over the place.

181642663

Good morning - in this changeset you sensibly established a single shop for the multiple rooms/floors. An alternative way to go about this would be to make the room/floors into a multipolygon relation which has the shop= tags. Have you seen something like that? I'm asking because there are other shops in this mall that have multiple rooms/floors. Also given your user name you might have a point of view on this one.

177134957

Also! If you see any sign of them connecting Crossness Road to Handley Page Road (bridge needed?) that'd be well worth adding!

177134957

Hi there - I've actually been to have a look in person now (back in February) so I've made some updates to reflect what it was like back then. (Also adding the construction site at the south-east end of Hinewood Rd). If you know the area - does it look OK now? If you notice that more of the construction is finishing, please do update things or let me know.

150916877

Interesting, and thanks! I generally use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ (YoHours) which makes nothing of it.

150916877

How should these opening hours be interpreted - "09:00-(sunset-00:30)"?

181090008

Welcome to OSM! This is an amazing find. I've been on on Wanstead Flats many times and never spotted it.

180738420

That's too many moving parts to assume it'll be the 14th - but one never knows!

180738420

Maybe they're waiting for a VIP to come along with scissors for the ribbons, and they're all in local election 'Purdah'

180763270

80 Henniker Road (912531435) is a weird one. Got demolished ages ago, and now the site is just empty. Planning permission was granted yonks ago for a site-filling, 4-storey block of flats. I'll shortly go and add the planning ref to the OSM object.

180738420

Roach Point Bridge still not reopened, then? *sigh*

180166762

It should! Will fix in a moment. These tags are sorta-unofficial and I think there are a few variants around - with and without the :GB, (un/)capitalised borough name, etc. But this one is defo wrong.