Thanks my 6 year old typo you just fixed! Thank you!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186701995

OK great. I've added the following changeset to actually close it. Your changeset left it as a functioning, open shop called "Poundland (Closed Down)". I've changed it from "shop=variety_store" to "was:shop=variety_store". changeset/186457552

interesting. I'll pay then a visit this evening during their opening hours, and we can take it from there

Good morning. Are you sure this shop is closed down? It's still listed on their website. I had a look last night and the branding was still visible.

My mistake - thanks for fixing it!

Looks like there's been a credible edit in April with something of a review in the description field; so I'm happy to remove the construction stuff.

*not been there

For way/1458370800 as far as I know, it should still be a construction site. But I've been there for several months now - it seems likely it's opened. I'll fix it up later this evening.

If you have a look now, you'll see that the object is back but it just has these tags:

addr:city=London
addr:housenumber=8
addr:postcode=E20 1FU
addr:street=Abercrombie Road
check_date=2026-06-12
source:addr:postcode=fhrs opendata
was:fhrs:id=1542682
was:shop=bakery
was:name=Charles Artisan Bread

Hi there. I'm about to revert this changeset. (Undo it). Although Charles Artisan Bread might be closed; the premises still exists. So I'll restore the premises, and then remove the tags that define the business, and make it present, but unused

Good point. I think this one didn't have a POW tag either. It seems to be a multi purpose muslim community centre, mosque, madrassa etc. but it's a large pair of grant semi-detached houses originally.

So next time I have a mouse on my hand I'll ser the building to terrace and building:use to mosque along with the POW tags you suggest.

That does seem more likely, I'll update/correct, shortly.

I think iD is wrong to assume that - though it may be appropriate in most cases. Here's a discussion on the subject - https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-a-way-that-has-a-road-marking-for-pedestrian-priority-cycle-slowly/7767 .

So I suppose, whoever is there next can check the signage (painted on on tarmac in big white circles at all the entrances to the park (last I looked)) and flip ti back to highway=footway if needs be.

It's not an issue. The routes are available for cycling and foot traffic. It would be appropriate to make them bicycle designated and food designated.

However on the ground signage says that they are pedestrian priority. (Unless it's worn away or been removed in the last couple of years). I think that means it's not appropriate to mark them as highway=cycleway.

What sort of cycleways would have pedestrian priority?

Hi there. From memory, these paths are marked pedestrian priority at all entry points to the park. is these a reason you've changed them to cycle paths?

Oh - your bluesky post confirms this!

I didn't actually make it out there this weekend - suffering from a sore foot at the moment. I've been watching the surprising amount of progress around Bridgewater Bridge from the Liz Line. It looks as if the footpath between Iron Bridge and the Greenway is going to be open soon too (if is isn't already) with benches and landscaping.

(what happened to require a police cordon, I mean)

any idea what happened? I might be able to get over there tomorrow and have a look.

Good work and thank you for it. If you paln to do more of this sort of thing, don't forget about the Import Guidelines osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

It's great to see OGL data being identified and brought into the database.