Danke für die ausführliche Rückmeldung :)

Denke dann passt das (wenn tracktype entfernt wird).

Freue mich über jedes Paar Augen welches hier hilft 👍🏻

Thank you

You're welcome. And don't worry, as long as we keep working together in this constructive manner everything's fine 👍🏻

You can go to @Thomas%20Parrott/history where you see all your previous edits. Some of them have a speech bubble with a number next to them. Those have comments attached which is a strong indicator that you might want to check them out.

But as I said in a previous comment it probably won't hurt if you check all of your buildings because the quality of the ones I checked a couple of month back was really not good.

(I try mapping foreign places every once in a while but I personally feel that it's really hard to make out building shapes in places that I haven't visited before and that aren't like central Europe so often enough I decide to not map there. But that's my personal way of handling this)

👍🏻

Hi Thomas,

you asked for review on your most recent three changes.

From what I can make out in the available aerial images I'd say your buildings look very much ok.

There's still some that could use some squaring (use the "Q" key) but apart from that it's good :)

Couple of month ago you said you'd go and fix your earlier edits. Would be nice of you to pull through on that.

If there are questions, don't hesitate to ask
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187242083

Moin :)

ist das nicht schon ein power=plant statt generator?

cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187252036

Moin :)

sollte in dem Fall nicht oneway:bicycle=* gesetzt werden? Zusätzlich zum "normalen" bicycle=yes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187215432

Hi :)

you moved an ATM in this changeset node/2499640062

was that on purpose?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187221246

When reading the footer of http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/tempusfugit/marine/index.htm I strongly suspect that we must not use the data provided on that page at OSM.

I also currently think that swift removal is the way to go.

(also: better talk things like these through *before* engaging in what must have been work)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187228576

Ich schon wieder :)

warum machst du aus der Obernburger Straße denn einen highway=tertiary? Findest du die Verkehrsbedeutung wirklich so hoch?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187229979

Moin julianminus,

bei zwei Abschnitten hast du aus highway=track ein highway=path gemacht.

Bitte beachte, dass auch schlecht nutzbare Feld-/Waldwege als hw=track erfasst werden, wenn sie prinzipiell für zweispurige Fz. ausgelegt sind (Traktoren, OffroadPKW,...).

Sollten die Abschnitte wirklich nicht für Land- / Forstwirtschaftlichen Kraftverkehr geeignet sein (idR heißt das "zu schmal"), dann sollte auch tracktype=* entfernt werden.

Ggf gerne nochmal fragen, wenn etwas unklar ist.

Grüße

silversurfer83
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187230453

@StreetSurveyor what's the "road under construction" feature? It is preferable to name the proper tags because that's unambiguous.

If you mean highway=construction then I'd like to point out that existing features that get a new paint of coat are usually not retagged. OSM is a database and we know that many of our data consumers only update every once in a blue moon for different reasons and then there's the end user of that data who also only update every couple of month if at all. We try not to break routing for these users. Construction work like this generally has signed detours so people still can use our data to route. So my comment from ~4 month ago is the way to go.

Moon @Negreheb
Der Golfplatz ist Geschichte. Das Gelände ist nun für viele Jahre an die Betreiber vom Drachenfest verpachtet. Daher ist schon möglich, dass die neuen Wege recht langlebig sind. Müssen halt entweder vom aktuellen Luftbild oder vom eigenen GPX erfasst werden.

name entfernt

changeset/187201407

und?

Und?

Ok. Danke.
Nächstes Mal bitte erst fragen, dann zeichnen ;)

changeset/187200715