Seems to be rendered as expected even before my latest changes, though.
The multipolygon is crazy, not seeing anything obvious that could have affected this.

Thank you so much for spotting this.
The overlap causing this seems weird, as the residential area isn't a member of the multipolygon.
I've removed the overlap anyway, let's see whether it helps any.

There's a relatively fresh sign one building there with the name, but overall it seems likely that this will turn into a mostly summer house area. keeping it "residential" might indeed be the best option right now.

That "attraction" seems wrong, haha. As a minimum, it's likely "loc_name" :)

This added way/1069549979 , but it's not quite residential landuse, filled with building=cabin .
Looking at the landuse and leisure tag wikipages, cannot find anything better, though.
Maybe tourism=camp_site fits, but it could mislead tourists, as it doesn't seem to offer anything short-term.
The official name at least for a part of this is "Atpūtas bāze "Kalngale"" ( https://carnikava.lv/jaunumi/17-pasvaldiba/4220-pazinojums-par-detalplanojuma-projekta-nodosanu-publiskajai-apspriesanai-un-atzinumu-sanemsanai-nekustamajam-ipasumam-atputas-baze-kalngale ), mapped so.

Great, thanks :)
I usually leave such tiny islands/islets untagged, but either way seems fine.

Perhaps way/1028666803 should be place=islet, or not have place tag at all?
place=island#When_to_avoid_place=island

Sounds good, thanks.

Harrr - well, I did add a bicycle parking stand and surface for all the serviceways ;)
More micromapping possible almost always (surveillance cameras? lamp posts?), but from the dedicated survey point of view, I'd say this is good enough.

I guess I kept living_street classification from this original way when I was splitting it: way/989378384/history .
As it's all work-in-progress there, I'm fine with either classification :)

As far as I recall, it's not market as living street (yet?).

You committed this changeset 1.5 hours after I wanted to map the place - well done :D

Hi, this changeset added name:fr for a Latvian town of "Dagda" - but it was added as "Dadga".
Was that a typo?
node/119253538/history

Izrādās, pilnais nosaukums ir oficiālā adrese arī VZD datos.
Adrešu imports šo nosaukumu ir atjaunojis - atvainojos par kļūdaino noņemšanu :)
No BalticMaps informāciju gan nedrīkstam ņemt nekādu, ja kaut kas vēl palicis, vajadzētu paskatīties, kādi citi avoti vai pārbaudes dzīvē iespējami.

Burvīgi, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
Starp citu, papildus oficiālajai epasta listei ir arī OSM Latvijas Signal grupa - varbūt tur ir vēlme pievienoties :)
https://signal.group/#CjQKIBQDZFRYENhgTzY0czaSnYxt6-NCXdW5Rp2o6144bO4wEhCUSXKPmsjKnTbzUgLj0MpL

Super, liels paldies par atbildi - it kā prasās klāt "artwork", bet tas pats key :)
Skatos bildē, ka lietots "title case" - varbūt "name" vērts nomainīt uz "Rēzekne"?

This changeset changed operator and other tags on node/3709531147 , while ignoring the incorrect name. Please be more diligent when editing map data.

This changeset created a duplicate ATM at node/8709526406 (duplicating node/8693082929). Please be more diligent regarding existing map contents.

Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)
Šajā izmaiņu kopā pievienots "attraction" node/8987840335 , pievienots tikai nosaukums "RĒZEKNE".
Kas ar to domāts?

Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)
Šajā izmaiņu kopā pievienoti vairāki vārdi, kas neatbilst OSM vadlīnijām - piemēram, ēkas "Pleskavas šosejas 14. km ielas māja" un "Pleskavas šosejas 14. km sētas māja", stāvvieta "Rīgas-Siguldas šoseja 1E" un brownfield "Rīgas-Siguldas šoseja 1C".
Šī informācija iederas dažādos addr:* tagos, bet vārda (name) tagā liekami tikai īsti nosaukumi [1].
Te dažus mazliet palabošu, bet varbūt vēl kaut kur zināmi labojami.
Vēlreiz paldies par burvīgajiem uzlabojumiem un lai jauka kartēšana :)

[1] name=*

Pārlūkojot izmaiņas, radās iespaids, ka daļa ceļu ir privāti - tos nomarķēju ar tādu atzīmi.