ralley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 119274951 | Again you have changed a road to a drive way but left th name tag which is inconsistent
|
|
| 119256678 | You have changed this to a drive way but left it tagged with a street name
|
|
| 119256249 | You have changed this to a driveway but left a street name tagged, that seems wrong
|
|
| 118713809 | You have tagged this layer=-1, I don't think it is underground
|
|
| 118723717 | Please just stop - this is vandalism |
|
| 118721604 | What is your source for the cafe? It does not match the aerial imagery
|
|
| 118723176 | What is your source for the fast food outlet you added? It does not match the aerial imagery and the name does not look genuine.
|
|
| 118240966 | Please use meaningful changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
|
|
| 106696552 | The conflation strategy used with this import has not worked - it has introduced many duplicate address nodes. E.g. Node node/8660691512 and node/3208511029
|
|
| 117975272 | Please do not "test" changes like this in OSM - it is a live map in use by many people and your change has tagged a cycleway that does not exist - reverting
|
|
| 117897165 | Correction, source was Mapillary (Feb 2022 imagery) |
|
| 116942919 | Cleaned up with changeset/117452512
|
|
| 116942919 | Arghh sorry about that, I've been checking against the Maxar imagery and somehow missed that these were in the construction area. I will clean up
|
|
| 117030651 | I see you worked out how to fix - thank you.
|
|
| 117030651 | Please do not delete the wrongly tagged driveway - instead tag it as highway=service and service=driveway
|
|
| 116892654 | Yes just leave tags of in this case. |
|
| 116892654 | "Not Specified" is not used with the bicycle key anywhere else in OSM: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=bicycle#values Whilst you are generally free to use what ever values you want, no data consumers will likely use this value so the default of not specifying at all, as it was, will be functionally equivalent.
|
|
| 116833708 | Google maps is copyright and may not be used as a source for OSM edits: osm.wiki/Google
|
|
| 116487751 | Are these paths signposted as being legally not for bikes? As per bicycle=* this key is for legal access, not suitability which is what your changeset comment refers to.
|
|
| 116636544 | Avondale station already exists as way/61845866 and has done for 11 years. Also you have tagged this with building=yes and layer=2 which are both incorrect to the best of my knowledge
|