Do you mean highway=footway? highway=footway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107245888

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please note as OSM is an international project phone numbers should be in ITU-T E.164 format as per phone=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106985814

status=draft is unlikely to work for what you intended, have a look at tagging this as proposed instead: proposed=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106867594

NZ uses metric speed limits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106817592

Looks like you have a type in the name. Also consider adding tags to specify what the named object is, office=* may be helpful.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106701007

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Instead of using Bing imagery you are better off using the LINZ Aerial Imagery - it is much higher resolution and not so offset. Many buildings in NZ consist of only 90 degree corners this can be enforced in Id with the "Square" command (short cut "Q") accessed via right click when an object is selected.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106560488

I've extended Norwich Street slightly and added a non-exit (cul de sac) tag to match the CCC image.

Please don't abbreviate road as Rd, OSM practice is to use full names: osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106181030

What is the source for the name "Adams Path"? A lack of signs banning cycling on a path does not make it a cycleway and bicycle=designated, it is more likely to be bicycle=permissive
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106148190

What is the source for this name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106146759

As part of this change you should remove the construction=residential tag as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106062682

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. One minor point to note, many buildings in NZ consist of only 90 degree corners. You can enforce this in Id by right clicking and selecting "Square".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106118583

Are way/952632976, 95263978 the sidewalks/footpaths? If so they are missing the footway=sidewalk tag. Generally though the approach in NZ is to just add sidewalk tags to the parent road as in: osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_refinement_to_a_highway as it is much easier to maintain
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106089297

Are these names signposted or are you making them up? Why are you tagging the paths as cycleways and naming them Walkway - this is an obvious contradiction. If walkways where cycling is allowed they should be tagged as highway=footway with bicycle=permissive. You have recently made many similar edits and many have been commented on - please respond to these comments. OSM is a community effort.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106069732

Why have you tagged way/173225434 with layer=-1?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106066282

How can this be a cycleway if it is named ....Walkway?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106066913

Why is way/951827070 tagged with layer=-1?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106065081

Does this source have a licence compatible with OSM?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105952583

Why are you naming this walkway and tagging as a
cycleway?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105959695

Seconded, makes no sense to be named Adams Walkway and tagged as a cycleway
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105954239