Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, the residential area way/847808825 looks like it has a dragged node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90950163

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Youve set the name to "lake dunstan cycle trail" but the highway type is footway. Should it be a cycleway? highway=cycleway. Also please use capitalisation in the name
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90950213

Welcome to OSM and thanks for you edit. If you are looking to add a real estate agent you probably want to add a shop=real_estate tag as per shop=estate_agent You can also add the name and contact details.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90832563

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, please use descriptive changeset comments instead of hashtags: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also instead of deleting and recreating objects please edit the existing object so the history is not lost.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90690860

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, please don't use the name field to describe things, e.g. "Caravan Site and Dump Station", instead use tags like tourism=caravan_site and amenity=sanitary_dump_station. See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90690255

Additionally this is not visible in the LINZ aerial imagery referred to from the original changeset, what is the actual source?

Why are you adding fake features not present in the imagery you claim as a source? Reverted
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90460182

Is the deletion of this building outline also due to the protection orders you mention in the changeset discussion for changeset/90343430?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343430

Then please remove the tag but restore the building outline.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343063

Your changeset comment says your just correcting the boundary but you also deleted a building. Has it really been removed? It is still there in the aerial imagery from LINZ/ESRI/MAXAR
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343430

Has the actual building been removed or is it just not a place of worship? If the later please don't delete the way, just remove or correct the amenity tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90343063

Please dont put personal information such as names in name tags: osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90336621

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A tip - since most houses in NZ consist mainly of 90 degree corners in the Id editor you can select the outline and right click and select "Square" to square the angles.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90220120

Reverted with change set 89875621

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - but this one is wrong, the motorway here is represented by 3 parallel ways. The one you have edited represents the southbound clip on so was correct as one way and 2 lanes. Please undo your change as you have now made the bridge 14 lanes in total.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89797238

That's not the LINZ map that's in error, it is using tiles from OSM (see the attribution in the bottom right) and it's that (which you've now corrected) that was wrong. It will take a while for your fix to filter through to the tiles.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. This edit looks good but please don't use Google maps as a source - they have an incompatible licence. LINZ is the canonical source for road names in NZ and they have given OSM permission to use the data. See https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/53383-nz-roads-subsections-addressing/data/ and osm.wiki/New_Zealand_Data_Catalogue.
Cheers, Rob.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89754703

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Where did you find the name for this peak? It does not have a name according to LINZ. Also "start-date" is not used for peaks - see start_date=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88808466

Review as requested: opening hours look good to me. You can also check with https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88702704

But it is still a building so should be tagged as both - they are not mutually exclusive