You previously added this McDonalds and it was removed as fantasy mapping after you didn't answer questions on that changeset. It still does not appear at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants and in aerial imagery looks to be a residential property. Additionally your changeset comment is non-sensical. Is this a genuine McDonalds?

Thank you for addressing this.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169542645

Do these trees you are adding really have an name? It appears as if you are adding a generic "Pohon" (which I understand to be a translation of tree) to every tree. This is not correct or needed, see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171001802

Additionally some tags have been updated an not others (check_date; contact:*; email; mobile etc) which make this POI a weird combination of two businesses
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809378

Please do not use GSV as a source for OSM edits - it is expressly forbidden in their terms of service, see osm.wiki/Google
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169644353

The correct way to tag a destroyed building is to use a life cycle prefix (see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay) instead of tagging as an area. Also please don't change the name to a description: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169892054

Can you please advise what the source is for these peaks you are adding? Your changesets just list LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery and the peaks seem to not match the LINZ Height Point data from April 2025

Many of the names you added: "Staff Only", "Concrete Pad" etc do not appear to be actual names (as per osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Please use access/descriptions tags etc instead
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169542645

Why are you tagging latitude and longitude? They are implicit and do not need to be tagged: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:longitude
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169584122

Have you edited the correct building? This is 399 not 59

Why have you changed the building name? As seen in https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1028780289213963 the building is named "Pasadena Buildings" (and certainly not "=" which you changed it to)

You've removed this road with no source tagged and apparently LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery used which definitely shows tracks across the dry river bed. LINZ topo maps also show a track here. Additionally there was a ford tagged which you left.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169316581

Source was "survey;Mapillary"

Correction: source was LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery

"dirt path" appears to be an (un-needed) description not a name, osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166885132

Were you trying to map a building here? Tagging as name=building is not the correct way to do this, please see building=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166884884

Is the reference that you added for the bridge or the road? If for the bridge it should be tagged bridge:ref (see bridge=*#Bridge_numbers). See also note/4703942

Manukau Harbour has been correctly tagged as relation/8534169 for 7 years. This looks more like tagging for the renderer. Also is "Second-hand Books" the actual name (looks to be a description) or is it "The Open Book" as per https://theopenbook.co.nz/ ?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166555473

Hi the changeset mapped cycle-way lanes as separate ways, this should only be done where there is a physical barrier between the lanes

Instead of tagging areas of the school as 'landuse=grass' recommended practice is to use 'landuse=recreation ground' and 'surface=grass' as per amenity=school#Single_school_on_one_site.

Also instead of drawing multiple adjacent areas of the same type it is good practice to create a multipolygon and and cut out any different areas by making them `role=inner`