OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
161350748

You are continuing to add phone numbers in the wrong format and edit numbers that were in the correct format. See phone=*

161127702

Is this really concrete? It looks more like asphalt in the LINZ and Bing aerial imagery

161187296

Additionally in this and many other of your change sets you are wrongly changing the phone number format from E.164. Please see phone=*

161043993

It looks like for this and other edits you are appending "halal" in the name field to indicate that the amenity caters for halal diets. Looking at https://kebabseraibirkenhead.co.nz/ it seems the actual name is "Kerab Serai" and the halal should be tagged as "diet:halal=yes" (see diet:halal=*)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161043993

161127700

Is the service road (WAY: 297477811) really concrete? It looks like asphalt from aerial imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161127700

160850285

Why have you removed the service road within the carpark (WAY: 1110654367)? It still appears in the aerial imagery you refer to
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160850285

160456497

Thanks for addressing this, sorry I didn't reply earlier
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160456497

160015074

Source was actually survey, see Mapillary imagery

158475197

Hi, steps=yes is an actively discouraged tagging style, see highway=steps
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158475197

158475355

Bing maps show the house to the south of here appears to be gone.

158475355

You have added a park and removed a building here with only the LINZ NZ aerial imagery and no source listed. The change does not appear in the imagery - what is the actual source?

158360616

Also Puhinui details from visit. Sources also survey and Mapillary (still uploading)

158319653

Changeset description was wrong, actually updated completed apartments

157899766

Please use meaningful comments in your changesets: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157899766

155976483

Review as requested: Adding the building for the store looks good but the store is now mapped as both a node and a polygon (the building). The node shpould instead be replaced by the building so that the principle of "one feature, one OSM element" is followed: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155976483

154252618

You have changed the name of Clarence Street West to Calrence Street yet as seen in this June 2024 imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.8288956&lng=174.7928306&z=17&pKey=1655430748603131&focus=photo&x=0.6564028295139888&y=0.3780451361608255&zoom=1.1264080100125153). The signposted name includes "West", can you please advise what your source for this change was?

148791850

This change also dragged the address node for 25 Hugh Green Drive. (node/5513377408). Fixed.

134750030

You have changed way/102297848 from a building to a park which appears from aerial imagery to be wrong, was this deliberate?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134750030

134515853

Thanks for adding the driveway but once again you have added a made up name. As per osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag is for genuine names only.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134515853

57280475

Not intentional, fixed