Source was actually survey, see Mapillary imagery

Hi, steps=yes is an actively discouraged tagging style, see highway=steps
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158475197

Bing maps show the house to the south of here appears to be gone.

You have added a park and removed a building here with only the LINZ NZ aerial imagery and no source listed. The change does not appear in the imagery - what is the actual source?

Also Puhinui details from visit. Sources also survey and Mapillary (still uploading)

Changeset description was wrong, actually updated completed apartments

Please use meaningful comments in your changesets: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157899766

Review as requested: Adding the building for the store looks good but the store is now mapped as both a node and a polygon (the building). The node shpould instead be replaced by the building so that the principle of "one feature, one OSM element" is followed: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155976483

You have changed the name of Clarence Street West to Calrence Street yet as seen in this June 2024 imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.8288956&lng=174.7928306&z=17&pKey=1655430748603131&focus=photo&x=0.6564028295139888&y=0.3780451361608255&zoom=1.1264080100125153). The signposted name includes "West", can you please advise what your source for this change was?

This change also dragged the address node for 25 Hugh Green Drive. (node/5513377408). Fixed.

You have changed way/102297848 from a building to a park which appears from aerial imagery to be wrong, was this deliberate?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134750030

Thanks for adding the driveway but once again you have added a made up name. As per osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag is for genuine names only.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134515853

Not intentional, fixed

As per comments on changeset/128320877 to which you did not reply again you have performed a mass deletion of precisely mapped residential areas.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128750531

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, looks good except please don't use the name field for generic names like "house" it is reserved for proer names only osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things. In this case replacing building=yes with building=house would be appropriate building=house
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128018642

Abovencomment wrongly made to V3 instead of V4
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890

Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127023930

Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890

Please do not use the name tag to mark life cycle stages - it is for proper names only. Please see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125385141

Instead of adding POI's you edited existing suburb entries and changed them from suburbs to places of worship, this is not the correct way to edit
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124880453