OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
119274951

Again you have changed a road to a drive way but left th name tag which is inconsistent
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119274951

119256678

You have changed this to a drive way but left it tagged with a street name
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119256678

119256249

You have changed this to a driveway but left a street name tagged, that seems wrong
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119256249

118713809

You have tagged this layer=-1, I don't think it is underground
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118713809

118723717

Please just stop - this is vandalism

118721604

What is your source for the cafe? It does not match the aerial imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118721604

118723176

What is your source for the fast food outlet you added? It does not match the aerial imagery and the name does not look genuine.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118723176

118240966

Please use meaningful changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118240966

106696552

The conflation strategy used with this import has not worked - it has introduced many duplicate address nodes. E.g. Node node/8660691512 and node/3208511029
This is repeated on many address nodes along Mangere Road

117975272

Please do not "test" changes like this in OSM - it is a live map in use by many people and your change has tagged a cycleway that does not exist - reverting
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117975272

117897165

Correction, source was Mapillary (Feb 2022 imagery)

116942919

Cleaned up with changeset/117452512
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919

116942919

Arghh sorry about that, I've been checking against the Maxar imagery and somehow missed that these were in the construction area. I will clean up
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919

117030651

I see you worked out how to fix - thank you.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117030651

117030651

Please do not delete the wrongly tagged driveway - instead tag it as highway=service and service=driveway
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117030651

116892654

Yes just leave tags of in this case.

116892654

"Not Specified" is not used with the bicycle key anywhere else in OSM: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=bicycle#values Whilst you are generally free to use what ever values you want, no data consumers will likely use this value so the default of not specifying at all, as it was, will be functionally equivalent.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116892654

116833708

Google maps is copyright and may not be used as a source for OSM edits: osm.wiki/Google
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116833708

116487751

Are these paths signposted as being legally not for bikes? As per bicycle=* this key is for legal access, not suitability which is what your changeset comment refers to.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116487751

116636544

Avondale station already exists as way/61845866 and has done for 11 years. Also you have tagged this with building=yes and layer=2 which are both incorrect to the best of my knowledge
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116636544