ralley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 105946879 | Please use meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
|
|
| 105947001 | Please use meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
|
|
| 105937929 | Why is way/951850890 tagged as layer -1 is it really underneath other mapped objects? Also rather than drawing sidewalks separately consider adding sidewalk tags to the parent roads, it is much easier to maintain and generally the preferred option in NZ
|
|
| 105915115 | These are not access=private, it should be customer
|
|
| 105903084 | Please do not use the name field to tag descriptions like "informal crossing area" - osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
|
| 105802127 | Please see amenity=retirement_home and osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth on how to properly tag retirement villages and planned developments
|
|
| 105603953 | Please dont put made up names like "a path through" in the name field : osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
|
| 105151935 | Please use meaningful comments on changesets |
|
| 105073498 | Correction - Henderson, not Te Atatu South |
|
| 104853350 | You've tagged this as a turning_circle (highway=turning_circle) but described it as a roundabout - they aren't the same. If truely a roundabout it should be tagged as a mini_roundabout (highway=mini_roundabout) or drawn and tagged as a full roundabout (junction=roundabout)
|
|
| 104539155 | Please use meaningful changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. Also if this is a vaccination centre then the tags used seem wrong, see healthcare=vaccination_centre
|
|
| 104414691 | Please use changeset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
|
|
| 104386065 | Can you please use meaningful changeset comments?
|
|
| 104279125 | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Can you please use desciptive changset comments as per: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map. Also why have you changed the campsite to a park? The (unchanged) name and other tags suggest camp_site was the correct tagging.
|
|
| 104147190 | This changeset also moved node/5262962590 for 6/161 to the NorthEast of it's previous location which seems wrong, was it intentional?
|
|
| 103322520 | Based on the LINZ aerial imagery only the SW corner of the way appears covered so if mapped this way it should be split and only the actual covered area tagged as such. A more correct tagging is I believe to leave the way with no layer but covered=yes and tag just the overhanging portion of the buildings with building=roof and layer=1. Alternatively don't draw a seperate way for footpaths and just add sidewalk=left|right|both on the road - much easier to maintain topology this way as well |
|
| 103322520 | way/933228563#map=17/-43.47601/172.61973
|
|
| 103322520 | way/933228563 has been tagged with layer=-1 but is not tagged as a tunnel, is it really unde rthe other features?
|
|
| 103301625 | Is the swimming pool missing a location=indoor tag? See leisure=swimming_pool
|
|
| 102910208 | Imports must use a dedicated user account as per osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines#Use_a_dedicated_user_account
|