OpenStreetMap
ralley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 169892054 | The correct way to tag a destroyed building is to use a life cycle prefix (see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay) instead of tagging as an area. Also please don't change the name to a description: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
|
|
| 169584545 | Can you please advise what the source is for these peaks you are adding? Your changesets just list LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery and the peaks seem to not match the LINZ Height Point data from April 2025 |
|
| 169542645 | Many of the names you added: "Staff Only", "Concrete Pad" etc do not appear to be actual names (as per osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Please use access/descriptions tags etc instead
|
|
| 169584122 | Why are you tagging latitude and longitude? They are implicit and do not need to be tagged: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:longitude
|
|
| 169371996 | Have you edited the correct building? This is 399 not 59 |
|
| 169367985 | Why have you changed the building name? As seen in https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1028780289213963 the building is named "Pasadena Buildings" (and certainly not "=" which you changed it to) |
|
| 169316581 | You've removed this road with no source tagged and apparently LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery used which definitely shows tracks across the dry river bed. LINZ topo maps also show a track here. Additionally there was a ford tagged which you left.
|
|
| 167852506 | Source was "survey;Mapillary" |
|
| 167375824 | Correction: source was LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery |
|
| 166885132 | "dirt path" appears to be an (un-needed) description not a name, osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
|
|
| 166884884 | Were you trying to map a building here? Tagging as name=building is not the correct way to do this, please see building=*
|
|
| 158646418 | Is the reference that you added for the bridge or the road? If for the bridge it should be tagged bridge:ref (see bridge=*#Bridge_numbers). See also note/4703942 |
|
| 166555473 | Manukau Harbour has been correctly tagged as relation/8534169 for 7 years. This looks more like tagging for the renderer. Also is "Second-hand Books" the actual name (looks to be a description) or is it "The Open Book" as per https://theopenbook.co.nz/ ?
|
|
| 165702205 | Hi the changeset mapped cycle-way lanes as separate ways, this should only be done where there is a physical barrier between the lanes |
|
| 165356847 | Instead of tagging areas of the school as 'landuse=grass' recommended practice is to use 'landuse=recreation ground' and 'surface=grass' as per amenity=school#Single_school_on_one_site. Also instead of drawing multiple adjacent areas of the same type it is good practice to create a multipolygon and and cut out any different areas by making them `role=inner` |
|
| 165508295 | This changeset added a cycle path (way/1381663352) but this is an un-separated cycle lane on the road, which by convention is not drawn as a separate way. Instead such lanes are simply tagged on the road which was already done |
|
| 165599015 | Your changeset has show the section linking the Waterview Shared path and Laurel Street as reopened and yet only has the LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery as a source. This was updated because this section was fenced off and closed (as per Mar-2025 Mapillary imagery). Can you confirm it has really been reopened again? |
|
| 164611707 | Reverted for fantasy mapping |
|
| 164611707 | From the aerial imagery this appears to be a residential house and I can find no such branch at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants. Can you confirm this really exists?
|
|
| 163511908 | Please use descriptive changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|