Yeah I still treat them with respect, I just don't offer as much care or advice as I would a new contributor. I'm well acquainted with SEO editors :)

Good to know

When mapped as a single way, change:lanes=* and other *:lanes=* tags can be used to accurately represent the situation on-the ground.

If there are not physical barriers on the ground, this should likely be a single way in each direction.

Be aware, this changeset and changeset/181935891 are now under discussion at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1777565665812389. If you don't have an account there, you can sign up at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

This looks good; thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thanks for the edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please let us know if you have any questions. https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ is also a great resource if you're unsure how to map something.

That looks okay per https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rectangular-rapid-flashing-beacons-rrfb/134838/23. I'll add crossing:signed=yes as well, as recommended by that discussion.

No problem, we all mess up relations, they're so difficult to get correct. Thanks for being brave enough to work on the bus relations 🤣

Tracking relation cleanup:
* 3 variants of NB 7 done

Looks like this added relation/6833819 to the route master relation -- that wasn't intentional, was it?

Maple leaf greenway turns on 12th ave though, correct? That's how I'm reading https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/greenways-program/northeast but I'm not familiar with the area

Thank you, we appreciate your work to make OpenStreetMap data more accurate.

However, I'd like to point out that your changeset comment, "Update Tags," is not very helpful—we can see what edits you made, but the changeset comment is more about the intent behind the changes. That way, reviewers can look at what changes you made and compare them to what you said you were trying to do, so that we can spot any mistakes more easily.

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Huh. Thanks for investigating!

Sounds good

Oh, you did decide they were one way after all?

Thanks!

Okay. Well, sounds like it's fine to keep it tagged like this for now, in that case.

Happy mapping!

Thanks for the info! I think this should now be mapped correctly then. Note that it may take a while for this change to be propagated across all maps that use OpenStreetMap data.

Looks good, thanks!

Okay. And the corporate headquarters office is still in this building as well?