Thanks!

Okay. Well, sounds like it's fine to keep it tagged like this for now, in that case.

Happy mapping!

Thanks for the info! I think this should now be mapped correctly then. Note that it may take a while for this change to be propagated across all maps that use OpenStreetMap data.

Looks good, thanks!

Okay. And the corporate headquarters office is still in this building as well?

This feels more like the name of a route than the name of this particular segment of trail. Especially considering that the guidepost mapped at the entrance to the segment (node/1532104560) is tagged with the name of the main trail it connects to.

Let me know what you think.

Is this WSDOT map digital; can you link me to it? Thanks!

Thank you. Is this a separate "vending" storefront as opposed to the corporate headquarters that also appear to be in this building? That is, is there a corporate headquarters and also a regular branch location here? If not, the two points should be merged.

Thanks!

I disagree I think the buildings, escalators, ticket machines, bike lockers, platforms etc. -- infrastructure built in the immediate surroundings of the station -- all belong within the station area. Kind of like a landuse=* IMO.

Your changes look good to me. Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Is this different from @The%20Cleaning%20Authority%20Olympia and node/13594814843? Why did you create a new account?

This looks good to me, except that abbreviated names should generally be expanded: "Ste" -> "Suite" and "Ct NE" -> "Court Northeast". This is because computers find it easier to abbreviate full names for display purposes, whereas it becomes much more ambiguous when a user of OpenStreetMap data wants the full name. "St" could be "Street" or "Saint," and so on. You get the idea.

But that's a minor bit of feedback. Thanks for the contribution; I really appreciate it.

The entire complex has a single address? Or does 20225 refer to the leasing office, etc.?

Thanks

Thanks. Phone number format for the US in OpenStreetMap is like +1-425-892-8996 instead of what you added.

Also be aware that you tagged the opening hours as 11a-10p 7 days a week. This is fine; I just wanted to make sure this is indeed the same time every day. You could consider making the fact that this time is valid all days more explicit by doing something like "Mo-Su 11:00-22:00" instead--but again the way you've done it here is fine.

Otherwise, thanks for the contributions! We're always glad to have another member of the mapping community!

We want to have your business on the map, but in addition to the spam warning sent by the bot above regarding description=*, there are more issues with the following tags you added:

* addr:street=*
* opening_hours=*
* phone=*

Also it seems that this falls more under the category of plumbing than of janitorial work, so I updated craft=plumber as well.

Again, we appreciate you addition to the map, but please read the documentation before adding details in whatever format you'd like. I fixed this for you, but be warned that other volunteer mappers would not have been as kind.

Have a great day!

Thanks for the contributions. Please note that the name=* tag is almost exclusively for names that are written on a sign—they are not just a "label" for a map feature, because OpenStreetMap data is used for purposes beyond simply displaying general-purpose basemaps. Perhaps you meant to map the "yurt" building as building=ger instead? I've updated that, but let me know if it's not the case. Thanks, and happy mapping!

Yeah it's in the relation but it feels very much like part of the "train stop" over there too-- if we're going to include the 23rd ave entrance and its pathway to the platform within the station way, then I feel like the Rainier entrance and pathway should be in as well.

Aah! How did I miss those!? Thanks :)

No problem. Given that the little segment is not a driveway (per your change), I assume this must be designated 103rd and have updated as such. But I have not visited the area and the county map still doesn't reflect this change. Thanks for your help on this!

Shouldn't it include the B entrances on Rainier?

I think destination=* is the right tag for this; roads generally shouldn't be tagged with names unless there's a sign alongside the road reading "NB Off-Ramp to Clark Rd"-- rather, these roads are described by the destination roads they link to.

I did some more work on this area, let me know how it looks.