All editors handle way splits correctly, and if any didn't, it would be an editor bug. I've rejoined the ways at 49th and Granville, could you handle any others?

I also saw that when you split stuff one way ended up in relations twice

Ways can't be too long for adding a restriction.

Hello,
I'm wondering why you split way/472477000 into its own way. I can't see any reason to do so, and any relations on it didn't need it split.

Do you mean relation/6951615? There's no reason to split the way to add that.

So it is an import?

Those terms are the license you've got the data under?

Hello,

I was looking for some information on this source. Is it an import?

Is the stream direction for way/527730240 right? As it goes along it gets smaller and smaller, I'd have thought it was flowing to the southwest.

Living streets here surprises me since they're normally used where there are traffic problems - are you sure they're not residential roads or service roads?

Hello,

You've made way/527727984 which overlaps with a footpath. Does the footpath need moving, or is the building wrong?

Hello,

I'm wondering why you split way/472477000 into its own way. I can't see any reason for it to be separate. There's also something odd around way/475859247 where the highway has been split lots.

node/4827349525 was tagged as a highway rest area in the middle of a residential area. The childcare with "Capilano rivet hatchery" as a name sounds odd too, are you sure about that?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap,

I just wanted to let you know that I've added an office=lawyer tag to the point you added, to indicate it's a lawyer's office, as well as a bit of clean-up on the address and description.

If you want to join in the local community, we keep in touch in a few ways. One is the Canada-wide mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca, and another is the monthly Vancouver OpenStreetMap meetup at https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Vancouver/

Is there any imagery which covers the new construction?

This has made relation/5981481, a relation with the name of Bear Island but is the waterway.

It seems odd that you've surveyed roads in Europe and east Asia and added the data in the same changeset. Is this correct?

The website for A Rocha says 1620 192 Street but the address you have is 19353 16th Ave. I'm wondering which is correct

The restrictions on way/41407958 are probably better expressed as an access restriction.

Has there been any discussion of the license of the data you've linked to?

Hello,

You've created a bunch of places where the woods you've mapped extends into the water, e.g. changeset/8147113#map=16/50.1849/-120.5152

I'm also wondering if it makes sense to even have this tagged as natural=wood in parts like changeset/8147113#map=16/50.1650/-120.5545. It's always difficult to say what is and isn't woods in areas with scattered trees, but when you compare south of the road to the slope north of the road, I have a hard time calling south woods.

This changeset removes objects from changesets which used vworld, a government source. For more information you can read https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ko/2017-February/000260.html or contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group

Hello,

Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements (osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines), one of which the community is consulted prior to the import, including the imports@ mailing list.

Because this import is causing technical problems and has not been discussed, I'm going to go ahead and revert it. This should fix some of the technical problems data consumers are having.