Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

In this changeset you deleted the service tag, but I wanted to point out that the highway=living_street tag is incorrect, and a better change might have been to fix that and leave the service tag as-is

Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.

This left the turn restrictions broken with only two members. I fixed them up in changeset/135799616, but should survey to see if you can cross 13th headed southbound on a car.

Why did you remove the name:en tag here, but not any of the adjacent roads? What makes you think the name:en tag was wrong?

It looks like you did select all in JOSM and applied a tag. Can you link to the mechanical edit discussion where you described what you were doing, so we can see where it went wrong?

I've restored the driveway and added access tagging. There's lots of driveways mapped in OSM

We map all roads with OSM, if they're open to the public or not. Access can be indicated with access tags.

Hello,

you've tagged a residential house as a wilderness hut, perhaps your home. A wilderness hut is a remote backcountry building without services, not a house in a residential area.

I've reverted this change, since it was obviously incorrect.

The ways you modified are still signed as the 1A and 99A.

Can you make sure that any future organised edits have a wiki page created before they start?

Hi,
I was wondering, could you provide a link to the wiki page documenting this organised editing activity?

Judging by the imagery and online results, there's only one company physically there that does business under multiple names.

There's clearly a scrap_yard there, so I've cleaned up the duplicates and left the one that was originally mapped.

You've tagged node/7817486516 as needing a fee to use. It's unusual to have a fee on toilets in the middle of a large park like this - are you sure this is right?

Out of interest, if there is a fee, how do they collect? Coins to enter the toilet?

Hello,

this appears to be an import of DNR data. Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements, including that there is consultation with the community before they happen.

This import is a problem because it contains tags that shouldn't exist (e.g. Shape__Area), tags that haven't been converted to OSM tagging, objects that are divided but shouldn't be, and other problems.

Are you comfortable reverting this import, or do you need assistance?

No, this road is signed as oneway.

You've added a bunch of project=opensidewalks tags. In OSM we don't indicate data like that on objects. If needed someone can look at the history and see who added it and their changeset tags. I've fixed this in the local area in changeset/102625007

Hello,
I'm wondering you changed these from highway=track to a highway=service