pnorman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 122891147 | In this changeset you deleted the service tag, but I wanted to point out that the highway=living_street tag is incorrect, and a better change might have been to fix that and leave the service tag as-is |
|
| 30418069 | Hi,
|
|
| 63559391 | Hi,
|
|
| 46968735 | Hi,
|
|
| 135720850 | This left the turn restrictions broken with only two members. I fixed them up in changeset/135799616, but should survey to see if you can cross 13th headed southbound on a car. |
|
| 125238866 | Why did you remove the name:en tag here, but not any of the adjacent roads? What makes you think the name:en tag was wrong? |
|
| 131321598 | It looks like you did select all in JOSM and applied a tag. Can you link to the mechanical edit discussion where you described what you were doing, so we can see where it went wrong? |
|
| 131032233 | I've restored the driveway and added access tagging. There's lots of driveways mapped in OSM |
|
| 131032233 | We map all roads with OSM, if they're open to the public or not. Access can be indicated with access tags. |
|
| 129067918 | Hello, you've tagged a residential house as a wilderness hut, perhaps your home. A wilderness hut is a remote backcountry building without services, not a house in a residential area. I've reverted this change, since it was obviously incorrect. |
|
| 124998267 | The ways you modified are still signed as the 1A and 99A. |
|
| 120955236 | Can you make sure that any future organised edits have a wiki page created before they start? |
|
| 120955236 | Hi,
|
|
| 124168664 | Judging by the imagery and online results, there's only one company physically there that does business under multiple names. There's clearly a scrap_yard there, so I've cleaned up the duplicates and left the one that was originally mapped. |
|
| 89475730 | You've tagged node/7817486516 as needing a fee to use. It's unusual to have a fee on toilets in the middle of a large park like this - are you sure this is right? Out of interest, if there is a fee, how do they collect? Coins to enter the toilet? |
|
| 111080047 | Hello, this appears to be an import of DNR data. Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements, including that there is consultation with the community before they happen. This import is a problem because it contains tags that shouldn't exist (e.g. Shape__Area), tags that haven't been converted to OSM tagging, objects that are divided but shouldn't be, and other problems. Are you comfortable reverting this import, or do you need assistance? |
|
| 102097540 | No, this road is signed as oneway. |
|
| 97661088 | You've added a bunch of project=opensidewalks tags. In OSM we don't indicate data like that on objects. If needed someone can look at the history and see who added it and their changeset tags. I've fixed this in the local area in changeset/102625007 |
|
| 80056069 | Hello,
|
|
| 92539251 | It's pretty clear that these points are not hamlets, and are either neighbourhoods or suburbs. Suburb might be more correct for some of them, but neighbourhood is certainly better than hamlet, even if it isn't perfect. I looked hard at O'Brien, which was located up 212th Street. I think the process of fading into obscurity has completed and the name is no longer used for the neighbourhood. Searching online, there seems to be no use of the term O'Brien to describe the area. Real estate sites don't list it as a neighbourhood and the city doesn't list it that I can see. I know that suburban neighbourhoods sometimes don't have that strong of an identity, but I'd expect to find some usage. I think the name is dead as a neighbourhood, and will live on in a couple of building names. |