pitscheplatsch's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178965315 |
Please create a DWG report for the user. I am unable to revert all the changes with my current tools. Thanks! |
|
| 179963221 | Thanks @bxl-forever |
|
| 179465836 | Thank you for your reply here. Your added description was not factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Feel free to add your business again. |
|
| 179883786 | Thank you for your reply here. Your added description was not factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Feel free to add your business again. |
|
| 179975157 | Thanks for fixing @jm428 |
|
| 179925100 | Thanks for the reply @iandees Best regards,
|
|
| 179937233 | 👍 Dankeschön |
|
| 179911939 | @ajmat Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like changeset/179937052 would be very helpful. Thanks! |
|
| 179774711 | @MappingMore Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like changeset/179808537 would be very helpful. Thanks! |
|
| 179695429 | @Wildsharky Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like changeset/179927858 would be very helpful. Thanks! |
|
| 179698958 | @Wildsharky Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like changeset/179734278
Thanks! |
|
| 179924580 | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: changeset/179925100 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. Furthermore most your mentioned nodes have not been edited/touched by your and this changeset. Thanks. |
|
| 179925100 | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: changeset/179925100 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. Furthermore most your mentioned nodes have not been edited/touched by you. Thanks. |
|
| 179925101 | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: changeset/179925101 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. Furthermore your mentioned node has not been edited/touched by your and this changeset. Thanks. |
|
| 179924873 | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: changeset/179925101 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. Furthermore your mentioned node has not been edited/touched by your and this changeset. Thanks. |
|
| 179911611 | @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: changeset/179911819 This would link your edits back to this changeset here. Thanks. |
|
| 179640463 | Reverted by changeset/179642433 |
|
| 179416500 | Partly reverted by changeset/179815332 |
|
| 179661852 | 👍 Thanks for your reply. |
|
| 179651156 | Yeah, I can definitely agree with that as well. I’ve changed a few rules in the bot so that it now tends to revert changes back to the previous tags instead of trying to detect spammy tags and remove them individually. Let’s see how well that approach works out. 🙂 |