#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

Same again, I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history.

Best regards.

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

Same again, I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history.

Best regards.

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

Same again, I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history.

Best regards.

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

Same again, I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history.

Best regards.

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

Same again, I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history. Thanks again for helping improve the map.

Best regards.

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history.

Best regards.

Hello,

Thank you for your reply. A more neutral and factual version of your text has already been provided in the first comment above.

Additionally, the relation you added does not appear to be correct. Could you please remove it?

Best regards.

Should be reviewed.

Thanks for your reply!

👍

👍

You're welcome! I think there are sadly still a few corner cases like this. I designed the bot with the goal of not reverting an entire changeset, but instead trying to keep any "good" tags from a changeset. However, doing a full revert would definitely be much simpler for such spammy edits ... 🙂

Thanks @iandees

You're welcome! And thanks again for pointing it out. It's always helpful to get feedback, especially if something doesn’t work properly, so I can fix it quickly.

Thanks for the kind words, Christopher!

I'm really glad to hear that NeisBot is helpful, and it's great to see others in the community caring about keeping OSM clean as well. I'll keep doing what I can on the tooling side, and feedback like yours really helps keep the motivation up 🙂

Hi taxi777,

Could you please explain the reason for renaming several streets here from Ukrainian names to Russian ones?

Thanks.

Hi taxi777,

Could you please explain the reason for renaming several streets here from Ukrainian names to Russian ones?

Thanks.

Hi taxi777,

Could you please explain the reason for renaming several streets here from Ukrainian names to Russian ones?

Thanks.

Thanks for correcting
changeset/178845714 and changeset/179219443

Hi @CAM-Gerlach_Revert,

ah, thanks for noticing, good catch :)

My bot did not remove all added tags. I have fixed this in @NeisBot, so it should not happen again.

Best reagrds,
Pascal