In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. I have checked the mentioned elements and can confirm that the current configuration is valid.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

Danke, bartgron 👍

Danke, bartgron 👍

🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by changeset/176016763

🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by changeset/176016569

Should be fixed by changeset/175918036

Should be fixed changeset/175928382

Should be fixed by changeset/175963649

Should be fixed by changeset/175979532

Sorry, I meant: changeset/175949054

Should be fixed by changeset/175951997

Hi FrankiiB,

Thank you for your reply.

Please take a look at the following node:
node/428803322

As you can see, you are the most recent contributor, and version 3 is part of this changeset.

Additionally, the referenced ways clearly indicate the crossing. Did you have a chance to review this?

I hope this helps.

Best regards,
Pascal

Should be fixed by changeset/175994220

Should be corrected by changeset/175921767

Should be corrected by changeset/175921306

Thanks for your reply. Where can I find your revised description?

Reverted by changeset/175916635

Thanks, user_5359

Thanks for reverting, citrula

Reverted by changeset/175344056

Thanks for reverting, Baloo