Changeset When Comment
69516546

Det räcker med det du skrev. Det är en formalitet vinu har avklarad 😅

69516546

hej. skulle du kunna gå med på att släppa koordinaterna för denna som CC0 så jag kan lägga upp den på wikidata?

86729707

Hereby released under CC0

32624899

Hej. Vad är källan till namnet?

86577250

Snyggt! Använder du relation toolbox?

86476989

Hi :) I see you update data on stores of different chains. How do you get the data? By asking them?

86261944

Fantastiskt att se att du förbättrar kartan. Hojta till om du undrar något.

81694921

Välkommen till OSM :)

81694921

tack!

60955550

Hej, what does the wheelchair=no mean on this path? way/609989191

75483154

Hi, you added wheelchair=no to a path? What does that mean?

76766631

I just started a tagging discussion of how to define a pond in an observable way.

76766631

FWIW I agree that way/9653990 looks more like a pond. But it could have been a lake that was shaped by humans and thus not "man-made" completely.

76766631

IMO pond should not be mapped because it is not observable on the ground. A lake defined as a water body completely encased in land is observable on the other hand. The hard part of this quest to tag lakes was to handle all the improperly tagged waterways, reservoirs, etc in e.g. Balkan.

76766631

I realized half way in that 1) the definition of pond/lake is subjective on the wiki. Thus the whole idea of discerning lakes from other waterbodies is moot as long as the definitions are crap. "A pond: a body of standing water, man-made in most cases, that is usually smaller than a lake." This is impossible to work with for me.
You can delete the source:lake, the validation fixes was only related to the multipolygons of some lakes.

76766631

Hi Polarbear. Correct, this was done before I was aware of the mechanical edits process and disadvantages. I personally find it valuable to be able to distinguish between different bodies of inland water. It should probably be reverted until a mechanical edit is agreed upon.
Because of the validation fixes the revert is probably best done by removing the tags only and not reverting the whole changeset.

81221402

thanks, welcome to OSM!

81030467

Oh, thank you for the information. Maybe you should switch to OsmAnd, which is also free software. I have the version from f-droid and adding POIs work very well. 😃

81064814

Hi patman37. Thanks for the clarification, we can keep it then. Because of the size of the bbox I cannot see what you changed in achavi. Please upload more often and with smaller bboxes to help others review your work.

81078720

Välkommen tillbaka!