Hi, you are expected to map the footprint of the building and if it looks like a house, tag with building=house, etc.
A random shape over the building is sub optimal and of no use to the map.

Hi, you are expected to map the footprint of the building and if it looks like a house, tag with building=house, etc.
A random shape over the building is sub optimal and of no use to the map.

Tks, it would be good to add some address tags as currently it appears it may be an online only entry.

Hi, I have sent a request for the osm dwg to have a look at it so you may here from them in the next day or so.
Don't be discouraged from further mapping though as these things are likely unfamiliar to you as new mapper.
We do need to be careful when using datasets because of the licence conditions.

The datasets we are able to use are listed here
osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources
As you were able to download from the site, it may be possible/probable to get explicit permission from Telstra to add to OSM.
You would then need to follow the import process and discuss with the Australian OSM community initially at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au or on the new community site if we get a specific Aust or Oceania site https://community.openstreetmap.org/
As this procedure hasn't been followed yet, it is best to revert your changesets for now.
I will ask the OSM data working group to do the revert as it is over too big an area for me to do with confidence.
Really appreciate you getting back to us so promptly and maybe hear more about the this database at a future time if you are able to get permission.
I wasn't able to find the specific dataset and was unable to the licence details.
Cheers, Nev

If you didn't follow this procedure, please leave as is and we can revert your edits.

Hi, have you followed the import guidelines for this?
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
Did you obtain proper permissions and licenses to use the data in OSM from the data owner.
Have you checked and resolved duplicates where these are already mapped in osm?

please zoom in closer and try to map building outlines more accurately. I re-mapped this house.

Hi, the natural=heath areas are vine rows instead. Are you mapping from satellite imagery alone?

Hi, do you occupy an office at this location?

Hi, this is a public map. This edit is reverted, please don't vandalise the map.

I have reverted as I expect these are just personal edits which don’t belong on a public map.

The osm database updates immediately but the rendered maps, such as the standard layer on osm.org, take a bit longer or a day or so for lower layers. You can clear your browser cache (ctrl+r on my mac) to force it to load the latest version. Alternatively, you can download via a Tor browser which is unlikely to be caching local images so much and can choose another circuit if checking often.

Hi, the ways leading to the property houses would be better tagged as highway=service + service=driveway and for some access=private and for the winery likely access=permissive
Many of the buildings could be more specifically tagged e.g. building=house
The area of property of the winery could be landuse=commercial and the craft tag only put on the winery building or a poi in that area like you have with the shop.
You have accidentally added a building tag to the crop area to the south of the main road.
These are only suggestions for you to consider further to assist in working out the correct tagging.

Hi, this is a public map. It seems likely you are mapping personal detail pertaining to GG on the map. Should I delete it?

no response, deleted Metro Award & Ceremonial Capability.

Maxar imagery suggests the building=retail only occupies part of this retail landuse area.

Hi, is the new building footprint taking up all this area?

I have done as described above

Hi, I added motor_vehicle=private to all highway=track in Mt Coot-tha Reserve so navigation apps don't route vehicles along them
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=127823685