correction:
added motor_vehicle=private to all highway=track in Mt Coot-tha Reserve, se Qld

Ok, the ones that appear to be fire trails or wide enough for that would be tracks and single pad ways would be paths.
I expect all the tracks within the Mount Coot-tha Reserve should have motor_vehicle=no to that routers don't use them for private vehicles. Most seem to have the foot and bicycle ok and most of the mountain bike trails are well tagged and on the western side of Sir Samuel Griffith Drive.

No public vehicles are permitted on any of these ways and they are mostly used by hikers or cycles but they are tagged as tracks if they can be traversed by two track vehicles like 4wds and fire trucks.

Hi
if these tracks are able to be traversed by the park managers vehicles and are used by four-wheeled (two-track) vehicles and often take the form of two wheel tracks in the ground, then they need to be tagged as tracks. This is regardless of whether they are used mainly by hikers.
highway=track
You are tagging the physical structure of the way that the vehicle or hiker is traversing.
Those that are narrow and not suitable to be traversed by two-track vehicles frequently used in bushland or remote areas are most frequently tagged as paths.

Offroad cycling and mtb trails have there own tags.

In Australia, most mappers prefer to use highway=footway only to tag cement footways around suburban areas.

I expect this changeset needs to be reverted to reinstate those that are tracks.

After reading more documentation I expect your form is ok for osm

or is this preferred…
way/511615479#map=19/-37.53022/143.82128

…or is syntax and semantics more freeform than I expected?

Should the addresses on these be instead tagged as
addr:housenumber=31
addr:unit=3
etc
addr:=**

Hi, I suggest that this building is rectangular with part of the tree overhanging the roof

I think you just need one line encompassing the area bounded by Federal Hwy, Phillip Ave and Antill St. The 'name=residential area' is not needed as the landuse tag gives that info.

Hi, Josm picks up 7 overlapping landuses here. If you do it more carefully and follow the fencelines and not join to roadway centre lines it be more useful.

Hi
is Metro Award & Ceremonial Capability a company or something else?
Also you listed the street as 1 Rider Blv and addr:steetnumber=5.
Should it be unit or shop 5 at 1 Rider Blv?

fixed now

I see now that progressive large changes are taking place and you have added one of the new access ramps to the motorway. Looks good.
https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/_/media/projects/p/pacific-motorway-exit-41-upgrade-interchange/exit41-project-newsletter---concept-design-february-2020.pdf
https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/_/media/projects/p/pacific-motorway-exit-41-upgrade-interchange/construction-newsletter_webpage.pdf

Hi, I can see some construction in this area. The location of this road appears unusual with the roundabout a 100m away. Is the road accessible by the public or is it only for construction vehicles?

this area is fixed

A closer view
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.27068&lat=-27.52723&zoom=16

Hi, the relation is not constructed properly here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.76921&lat=-27.09923&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
You may need to review how relations are formed on the osm wiki.

Hi, looks like you accidentally dragged an address node here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127186798

Hi, still a lot of mapping that needs correcting here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.94564&lat=-26.60251&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I have reverted this duplicate mapping