nevw's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178651395 | I relocated this to the stated address from the roadway |
|
| 178603958 | Hi, state, postcode and suburb are optional as these are fully mapped with their boundaries in osm. |
|
| 178603885 | It needs to join the osm mapped road so I made the connection. Thanks for your quick reply. All fixed now. |
|
| 178592359 | Hi, the ‘incorrect’ section of the cycleway you deleted appears to be the part that joins the cycleway to the road so that proper routing can be used. The cyclists must join the main road at this point so it should connect. A similar small section joins the main road before the traffic lights to. Connectivity is important for cyclists using navigation apps. The mapping of cycleway does end at the physical end point of the concrete surface in these particular junctions. Or is there a signage that indicates that cycleway users should not join the road at this point? |
|
| 178576208 | Hi, I used more recent Esri imagery to reshape the house |
|
| 178530186 | Link without the blue lines...
|
|
| 178530186 | Actually it is already mapped.
|
|
| 178530186 | I see the addr:street is present |
|
| 178530186 | Hi, I think Aldi would be better tagged as a supermarket
|
|
| 178423092 | I reverted your mass deletions of sections and damage to the Translink Bus 595: Parkes => Condobolin route |
|
| 178355804 | Tks, deleted now |
|
| 168250370 | Hi, I am fixing waterway loops using https://waterwaymap.org/#map=2/0/0
|
|
| 178217573 | Best house in the street! |
|
| 178215961 | Hi, please redraw the house outline instead of placing a rectangle over the plot of land |
|
| 178164166 | Hi, there a few errors to correct here
|
|
| 178164643 | Hi, I remapped this area using later Esri imagery showing new buildings which shortened service road. I notice in your comments you were using Esri but changeset tags indicate Bing. |
|
| 177875886 | Hi, osmi detected some errors here
|
|
| 178027744 | I added the driveway for Wallace South apartments and this will assist routing to find the right entrance once the navigation apps update.
|
|
| 177708812 | It looks good to me, but not sure if the outdoor seating area should be be part of the building.
|
|
| 177708812 | I don’t tend to do much building mapping but I would use building for outside perimeter and building building parts for the individual parts then 3d mappers can add their tags. building:part sections don’t render though so not many would map using that method - only the outside polygon tenders which would normally carry any name. Mutipolygons for buildings are best used when there are inners like courtyards. If you want more discussion, it is a good query to ask on our forum. |