...comes down to this I guess:
Valid multipolygon conditions
Generally, the multipolygon relation can be used to build multipolygons in compliance with the OGC Simple Feature standard. Anything that is not a valid multipolygon according to this standard (e.g., polygons with intersecting rings) should also be considered an invalid multipolygon relation, with the notable exception of touching inner rings.
...your has outer touching rings.
Wiki used to have better invalid examples of shared outer rings but I can find it now but wiki is becoming less useful with time.

osm website also has a link next to the search box (icon with arrows) that shows how these navigation apps are routing through the area. Just drag the green and red icons to where you want to start and finish. These are yet to update but should be ok in a few days too.
The navigation apps also have individual update schedules.

These are versions of maps using the osm database data and their developers have varying update cycles for the maps. I expect the ones you listed will update within about a week but there are some using osm data that update very infrequently. You may need to fresh your screen to make the computer load and display the latest version.

Hi, please not alter correct tags to make your router work.
Try using https://brouter.de/ to validate routing.

Hi Florence, this was reverted by me due to it breaking the main highway.
I have edited the area and deleted the section of road that passes through the private property that is not to be used as as an access to the highway. I also added a 'no exit' tag at the end of View road and at the stub of road on the highway with a gate.
Once this propagates though the navigation apps there will be no routing through the property from osm data.

Hi, if you change the imagery to Esri all these new streets are visible. A lot of new Mapbox imagery has been updated too.

There multiple osmi errors in this area that need remapping to correct.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=131.70242&lat=-1.44674&zoom=14

Hi, please don’t delete private ways in osm.
We have tag to denote them as private - access=private
You own your property but you don’t get to control what is mapped on the osm

Hi, the coffee shop is already mapped

way/1466354404#map=19/-32.728232/151.558721&layers=D
It is best to add or amend already mapped items than duplicate them.

Hi, multipolygons cannot have shared segments between the polygons.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.00183&lat=-27.48620&zoom=19
Simple polygons instead of a relation is ok or use a polygon around the outside and use building:part to map three parts.
Osm wiki has info on how multipolygon relations need to be made.

Hi, multipolygons cannot share sides like you have drawn the water at the Yeppoon Golf Club.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.72138&lat=-23.14448&zoom=18
Just a simple polygon would fix it.
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Invalid_examples

I reverted this changeset as the deleted items are still evident on imagery. Let me know if situation is different on the ground.

Hi, your changeset only contains deleted items. Are all these items no longer present? or is there a another reason for the deletions.

correction: Why did you add New Zealand details to this reserve in Victoria?…..reverted.

Why did you are New Zealand details to this reserve in Victoria?…..reverted.

I reverted this changeset because it is easier for you to add the business details again yourself being careful not to accidentally dragged other map nodes

Hi, I have reverted the living street with the name of "sun flats road" you added over top of existing tracks.
Can you further explain what you are trying to add so that we can help you do it properly.

Hi, I partially reverted this changeset which changed a section of the Tasman Highway south of Beaumaris to a path. This area seems fixed now.

Hi, you have accidentally dragged some nodes to incorrect positions.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177283165
In the top right a tree has been dragged to a building and at the bottom more obvious shifts.
When using iD you need to zoom in closely and be careful not to shift nodes accidentally. iD does have an undo button to use while editing and it’s needed often.
If you are unable to fix, comment here and I’ll fix tomorrow.

I have reverted this changeset which add a wetland tag to Darwin city poi and added a wetland point to a remote area