OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
134140404

The name of this cemetery does not render. I asked on Carto github https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4795
Not sure if it can be improved but tagging and geometry is fine to me. I might adjust the boundary of the cemetery closer to the roadway entrance later and this may affect the label.

134140404

I went ahead and added the cemetery as outer in the relation and Bora Ring as inner. I also added fence lines I could see. I also shifted the Tucki Tucki location marker a bit further away from the bora ring for clarity. Looks fine I think.

134140404

I haven't deleted the relation yet as you may prefer to add the add the cemetery border as an outer.

134140404

I deleted the relation with only an inner member as it is an invalid geometry for OSM.
If you feel the Bora Ring is not part of the cemetery then you would need a relation with the cemetery with the role of outer and the Bora Ring with the role as inner.
The bounds of the cemetery were previously drawn following the surrounding fence lines. Was this incorrect? The DCS various layers are not of much help but the base layer maybe the best of them.

133970296

Hi, you have mapped Axe on the roadway. Should it be over a building instead?

133897603

fixed now.

133897603

I have changed the name on the public transport bus stops in this changeset.
changeset/133964811
but there remains this stop and relation to fix but am unable to confirm the new stop name...
node/644682645#map=17/-35.19647/149.10796

133897603

Thanks TheSwavu

133897603

The osm needs to have the current name so I will go ahead and revert your edits to reflect the real name. Please take your cause to the ACT government to effect the change you desire. The osm is an operational map and it’s function relies on us mapping the current real world state.

133897603

Thanks for the prompt reply. In view of the name change, are you happy for me to revert your changes to reflect the current name?

133897603

The name change from William Slim Drive was delayed but should be complete by now
See this news article from 2022…
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/101092100

133897603

Hi,
the name William Slim Drive was changed some time ago I think.
https://www.planning.act.gov.au/survey-spatial-data-and-maps/boundary-surveying/roads-addressing-and-place-names/place-names/act-place-names-committee-and-guidelines-review

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/11185016

133815834

You have mapped a waterfall on a footway here. Was this intended?

133814499

You have mapped two restaurants by the same name next to each other here. Was this intended?

133723800

You appear to have mapped things here that do not exist.

128585362

I think this dataset is well suited to add to a map using Umap
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/new/#6/54.438/2.977
osm.wiki/UMap

95479732

I think this is completed now...let me know if I missed any.

128585362

The licence conditions at https://www.acma.gov.au/radiocomms-licence-data would seem to me to be unsuitable without getting explicit permission to use in the OSM.
I am not legal qualified to decide.
Probably the best course of action if you want to get it into the osm is to contact the osm data working group via data@otrs.openstreetmap.org or start a new enquiry about it’s suitability and the process to add it on our community help site https://community.openstreetmap.org/

133342499

Can you check the name in person as it seems to me that part of this street is called Donaldson and part is Frazer.

95479732

I have done a few of these today in changesets 133345436, 133346786, 133347147, 133347623, 133347652 and 133347700. Will proceed irregularly.