Hi, you have added the business to the entire shopping centre. I have reverted your edit. Instead, please add the business by adding a node inside the shopping centre building with the business tags, in the same manner that other businesses have been added here.

corrected link...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.73651&lat=-16.99666&zoom=14

Hi
there appears to be an error here for you to fix.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.73651&lat=-16.99666&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Incorrect wiki tags added to Bass Strait multipolygon Has been reverted.

Hi
Why have you added a wikipedia link to Bennison Island to the Bass Strait multipolygon?

I reverted this.
The Warringah Mall one seems to be corrected added. Maybe copy that method for the Rouse Hill shop.

Hi, you have added Price Attack Rouse Hill details to the whole of the shopping centre in this edit.

This will take me quite a while to do.

no response, reverted as the tags were correct before these edits by new mapper.

Have split in to two buildings. Not clear on Bing but other imagery shows two buildings.

See tags here node/2790540616#map=19/-37.94080/145.13943

Hi, this not the correct way to tag the address of a business. Have a look at how Computermax is tagged to correctly do it. Computermax is in the same block.

Yes, that is what I will do as the Capad is a quality dataset and recent.

There are two separate houses here and you have mapped as one building.

Hi, I’d like to excise the state forest boundaries from the Capad listed conservation areas in line with the parliamentary bill and later fix the state forest boundaries when access to the forestry boundaries becomes available. Is this ok with you?

Ok, thanks.

… probably simplest to shift address details to a node and delete the polygons

Should we revert the mapping on Taylor St, or would you prefer to re-map the individual buildings here?

This https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/parliament/bills.nsf/873B3076AB9C6B5148256EBC000D142D/$File/EM_Bill306-1.pdf
mentions at clause 11 the excising of state forest land to expand Greater Dordagup National Park as per CAPAD data. This was some time ago.
Pity we are not able use WA Landgate datasets to fix it all up.
Perhaps someone knows of more protected area datasets that include forestry that we may be able to obtain explicit permission for inclusion in OSM.

Hi, it is not common to add individual landuse=residential to each plot as often the entire area of all the residential houses in the area or in each block is already tagged with a landuse=residential polygon and results in duplicate tagging.
It is more usual to map the fence lines if you want to define each property boundary.