OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
162796939

Hola xrosarinox. Para mantener el nombre anterior en el historial y por si alguien lo conociera mejor por el nombre anterior, volví a añadir este pero con la etiqueta "old_name".

Véase osm.wiki/ES:Key:old_name

Saludos.

162776612

Hello. This change in the street address is false, since there is no street in that section. I live in that neighborhood and I pass by there almost every day.
This needs to be reversed to avoid navigation problems, as it does not represent reality.
If you have any questions regarding this, I am willing to answer them. Best regards.

162079602

Hello. The barrier tag has been added for the node, within a section of the street.
Please correct it. Regards.

161854468

Hi. Why did you add “access=no” in the barrier node, if here would be the entrance to a parking lot? Are you sure that no person is allowed access, even the owners of the parking lot? Wouldn't it be better to change it to “access=customers” or “access=permissive”?

Greetings.

161604181

Hi. What does the tagging you added of “assign=poor” mean? Since I wanted to search in the wiki but didn't find anything. Is this tag documented somewhere or is it something internal to you?

161320457

Hola. Como falta la categoría del elemento, ¿podrías indicarme de que trata esto? ¿Es público o privado? ¿De donde has obtenido esta información, para mapearlo correctamente?
Saludos.

161324668

Hola. ¿Esta laguna se llama así realmente o es una descripción de la propiedad? ¿Es una laguna pública o privada? ¿De donde has obtenido esta información, para mapearlo correctamente?
Saludos.

161503609

Reversión de nombre del changeset #161503311

161503311

Perdón, me he dado cuenta que sin querer cambié el nombre de la RN33 por Avenida San Martín. Esto se hizo con un complemento de JOSM automáticamente. Pronto lo corregiré.

161320756

Hola. Gracias por interesarte en colaborar al proyecto.
Con respecto a esta edición ¿Qué es lo que has querido mapear? Porque falta añadir la categoría correspondiente.
Saludos.

161106364

I don't know physically where there is an actual crossing and where there is not by the center median, as I don't have images to prove such a case. But you have told me that you have updated images and if they are of quality, you should be able to make out where the center median is cut or if there are turn arrows painted on the street.

That would be a great help in correcting the navigation, since as it currently stands, to cross from one direction to the other, you have to do several km and I guess this would not reflect reality.

e.g. osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-33.055688%2C-60.599502%3B-33.055454%2C-60.599492#map=16/-33.05774/-60.59423

161106364

I must admit that I do not know the area at the moment and I do not know which sections are finished and enabled for circulation and which are not, but if updated satellite images show that they are ready for use, perfect.
Here are some sources of information that I was able to gather for reference:

* https://cuestiondedesarrollo.com.ar/se-construye-una-nueva-autovia-en-provincia-de-santa-fe/
* https://www.santafe.gov.ar/index.php/web/content/view/full/185544?e=0&p=1
* https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/autov%C3%ADa-rp21-alvear-fighiera-ex-rn9-seccion-bs-as-rosario-provincia-de-santa-fe.2400442/?post_id=190230626#post-190230626

The issue that concerns me is the correct navigation with the crossings connected in both directions. As they are currently, the calculation of navigation on that avenue is greatly deteriorated.

161106364

Hello. I see that you have "opened" the section of road under construction, but I don't see any source of information where such an enabling of circulation is mentioned.

How do you know that you can now drive in that direction of the route?
If so, the missing street crossings should also be added.

160469498

Por favor, para pequeños cambios en el mapa, divide las áreas de cobertura en secciones más pequeñas (barrio, ciudad, área metropolitana) para que no se preste a confusión y no se alerten falsamente los validadores de datos.
Gracias.

160361142

¿Por qué se agregó un sentido único enfrentado al otro en ambas vías? En mapas oficial no aparece así.

https://infomapa.rosario.gov.ar/emapa/mapa.htm

160379571

Por favor, revisar ya que en mapas oficiales figura como de doble sentido.

https://infomapa.rosario.gov.ar/emapa/mapa.htm

159894604

Hola. Gracias por colaborar en OpenStreetMap.

Te comento que tuve que revertir tus cambios porque borraste interpolaciones de altura importantes para la navegación en el mapa.

* changeset/159899569

Si tienes alguna duda de como comenzar a editar en el mapa, puedo ayudarte o puedes preguntar en el grupo de https://t.me/osm_ar

Saludos.

159877562

Hi. What is the reason for changing the oneway label again? This issue had already been clarified in another changeset.

* changeset/158841435

Please don't make edit war without knowing the area because it costs work and time to correct.
Also they do not follow the local regulation of adding oneway=no for two way roads.

* osm.wiki/ES:Argentina/Etiquetas#Sentidos_de_calles

159635012

Disculpas, ya lo corregí.

159635012

Hola Patodiez. Revisando tus cambios, me encontré que en Coronel Arnold ( relation/4213746 ) podría estar rota una relación de landuse=residential.
Por favor, revisala para corregirla.