Hallo,
"winter_service:cycling:net" ist ein merkwürdiges Tag an einer Straße. Der Begriff "cycling" wird in OSM nur an Sportanlagen verwendet. Für normale Wege müsste es entweder "cycleway" oder "bicycle" sein. cycleway wäre wohl korrekt, da es hier ja um die Räumung der Radwege geht.

The wrong tags are still there:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22Cbicycle_parking%22%3D*+global&R

Hi,
"ref:kulturminneid" is a new tag.
"ref:kulturminne" is documented and in use.

Hi,
could you check the tags on this supercharger? The socket tags are deprecated and should be replaced:

socket:=**

Hi,
could you explain what you tried to map here? All these ways have many foreign tags and no common ones.

Hi,
is the "oha" tag here meant to be "cables"?
node/13630002338#map=19/43.788475/6.647307

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used many tags like "adega" in your edits.
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the presets of the editor should be used.

Would you mind checking these tags and change them to documented ones? Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!

Hi,
the tag 'gas:gn' isn't used in other places.
What does it mean?

Hi,
what's the difference between a "ground_control_point_test" and a man_made=survey_point ?

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.

Hi,
you added "FIX_ME = YES" on 13000 objects. Was this a mistake?

Hi,
the collection of data and providing it in OSM is for sure a very good thing. The way it was added is a bit problematic.

Given all the different things uploaded during a short time in this project, the central point should be following the organised editing and import guidelines, including full planning of what is uploaded, which tags are used, and how merging with existing objects is planned.
There are huge amounts of wrong tags, e.g. "roof_materials" or "true" as value. These should have been fixed before upload, including a full review of all warnings and errors given by the editor (there for sure have been many!)

Hi,
could you check these parkings? Many got a misspelled "Cbicycle_parking" tag.

Hi,
could you check the tags added? There are many that are not used by anybody else, e.g.

material:roof -> roof:material
material:wall -> building:material
toile:cover -> ???
opening_days -> opening_hours
power -> power_supply

I also found tags with strange values like
shelter=indefinite

Hi,
could you check the tags added here?
"capacity:teacher" is not used, but "capacity:teachers".
"capacity:classroom" is not used by others, but "capacity:classrooms"