Hi,
could you explain what this "waterworks = water_control" is? This tag isn't used in other places.

Thanks!

A building needs to have a tag describing it is a building.

There shouldn't be any tags like "are_in_me" or coordinates like in your changeset.
I also noticed that the alignment of buildings is very bad - buildings overlap in many places which clearly can't be right.

I reverted this upload for now, please start with documenting the planned import according to the Import Guidelines.

There is no requirement to have a source tag for every tag. E.g. imagery is the same throughout a changeset and should be added to the changeset itself, but not to every individual object.

If my edit to "source:geometry" made it too short, please feel free to add the year back to the tag.

It's "source_ref": "Used to link external source of information"
source_ref=*
I used the key "source_ref:name" - the reference to the source of the 'name' tag.

23 source tags for the name of a minor residential road is too much.

It's not meant to provide a full bibliography with author, title, isbn and year of publication. As the tags are now one can still identify the place you got the information from.

At the very most it would be sufficient to have title and isbn in a single tag, all other information and tags are not necessary.

Was ich gesehen habe sieht gut aus.

Hi,
"hazard:flammable_gas" is not a common tag. Is there a ban for gas-fueled vehicles here? That's often tagged as "access:fuel:lpg=no"
node/13257381979

Hi,
which language is "name:au"? That's not a defined language code.

Something went very wrong with this import - all the objects don't have valid tags, they are overlapping with existing buildings and roads.

I recommend reverting this edit, and starting fresh after reading our import guidelines:

osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

z.B. bei Taginfo nach dem richtigen Wort suchen und ähnliche Tags anzeigen lassen.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/separation#similar

Dann einen auswählen und rechts oben auf Overpass Turbo klicken.

Hallo,
die 'parking' Tags hier gibt es seit ein paar Jahren so nicht mehr. Seit dem haben wir ein neues Schema: osm.wiki/Street_parking

Hi,
bitte checke deine Tags / Presets. Es ist "separation", nicht "seperation".

Hi,
could you explain what this sign shows? The tags are not sufficient to tell.
node/13255172612

Hallo,
bitte prüfe die "socket" tags. "ccs" ist kein gültiger Steckertyp.

I don't fully understand the proposal in this post, because automatic translation is too bad.

What is the actual significance of the colors, if there are different combinations that is not covered by the common recycling tags? A tagging scheme with only colors is not used in any place, apart from a 1-user one time import in a town Italy.

Hi,
"terrace" might not be the right tag in OSM. "terrace" refers to a place to sit at in the front of a building.
"terraced" is building style.

Maybe you can check for a better tag - I can't come up with one right now.

Hi,
instead of "count:blue" (which is not helpful for people not knowing the locally used color scheme for containers) it might be better to state the type of recycling, e.g.
recycling:glass_bottles:count

Could you change that?

Hi,
what's wrong with this relation, apart from not being complete? It might be better to have it in a usable state instead of prefixing every key with an undocumented "incomplete".

Hi,
could you describe what is / what is not allowed at this point? The tags are unfortunately not correct.

"website:departures" ist das gängige Tag für Abfahrtspläne.

Hallo,
bitte schaue mal nach den Ladestationen die du eingetragen hast. "socket:ccs" ist kein gültiger Steckertyp, siehe:
socket=*