OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
168129704

Hi,
you're right that it is indeed
amenity=kick-scooter_parking.
(this tag was coined before "kick_scooter" was proposed as the vehicle type)

All the *_rental, *:rental, and *_parking tags use the vehicle type in the key and therefore should be "kick_scooter_parking=*".
There is AFAIK no other key of this group with a dash in it. Having a dash in the main key is very uncommon.

168904236

Und die circumference können auch nicht stimmen.

168904236

Bitte schau hier mal nach den Tags.

"no", "neu" sollten keine Keys sein

in 'genus' sollte nur der lateinische Name stehen

ein Tag wie natural=tree fehlt

168766238

Hi,
please check this way, something went wrong with the destination tags:
way/1413983936

168760834

Hi,
could you check this node? What is "recycling:pile"?
node/12993203288#map=19/45.848219/3.531297

168848644

Hi,
why did you delete a dental office here?

The amount of edits all across the US looks like some commercial project.

Please read and follow the
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
and the
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

168716062

Hi,
you added a couple of strange 'rv:..." tags. Could you explain what they mean?

168708661

Hallo,
bitte schaue nochmal über deine Tags. Bei vielen taucht "source" irgendwo in der Mitte auf. Allerdings ist "source" ein Präfix, gehört also an den Anfang, z.B. source:cycleway:left:width.

168617875

Bitte schau nochmal nach dieser Flaeche hier, da stimmt das Tagging nicht:
way/1413078986#map=19/50.092347/11.857557

168704522

Changing a tag that has been in use for more than a decade and is used 130k times is very difficult - you need to update all the tools that use the tag, update the memory of all the mappers that remember the old tag, change all the editors... In general it's not worth all the effort.

168388658

So wie es im Kommentar steht: Ich habe einen fehlenden Doppelpunkt ergänzt. southroute -> south:route

168468412

Dort habe ich leider keinen Validator für die Reihenfolge im Tag eingebaut. Das Tool akzeptiert einige vom üblichen Tagging abweichende Varianten, z.b. hier werden beide Fahrtrichtungen gleich dargestellt, aber nur "backward" ist korrekt:

https://osm.janmichel.eu/destinations/example/sandbox.htm#country=DE&tags=destination:forward:lanes%20=%20A%20City|https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:Not%20A%20Town%0Adestination:forward:lanes:ref%20=%20A%203|https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:%0A%0Adestination:lanes:backward%20=%20A%20City|https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:Not%20A%20Town%0Adestination:ref:lanes:backward%20=%20A%203|

168468412

Hi,
schau doch nochmal auf die destination-Tags. Ich habe hier wieder einige korrigiert:
changeset/168514644

168434740

Hi,
something went very wrong here. All these tiny buildings are drawn with more than 400 node and a strange "Preparation = Phase" tag. Could you check that?

168330594

The start of protection is often tagged as "inscription_date", mostly with a prefix denoting the organization
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/inscription_date#similar

The two id tags can be in OSM, if they give a reference to some other public database. The common scheme for such ids is "ref:XYZ" with XYZ being the abbreviation for the database.

168245405

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please have a look to the tutorials on how to add roads to OSM. The ones you added here I just fixed.

168170334

Hier sind die Änderungen:
changeset/168258545#map=12/50.0849/12.5348

168221973

"wheelchair" is the key that summarizes many different kinds of disabilities, in the same way the wheelchair symbol on parking spaces doesn't restrict it to wheelchair users only.

"toilets:wheelchair:grab_rails" is in use since a couple of years. I don't think there is a good reason to now introduce another tag for this. Also note that there is a recent, but not much liked proposal for various new "grab_rail" tags.

168170334

Dieses Schema hier sollte fast immer stimmen:

destination
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:colour]
[:ref|:symbol|:street|...]
[:to]
[:lanes]
[:forward|:backward|:both_ways]

168170334

Hallo,
schau bitte nochmal nach deinen destination-Tags.
Die übliche Reihenfolge der Subkeys ist eine andere, z.B.
destination:lanes:ref:colour -> destination:colour:ref:lanes
oder
destination:ref:forward:to -> destination:ref:to:forward