mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162089326 | Please check the tags you added on all these gas stations. You claim the source is "Official Ukrnafta data" - is this data available under a license that is compatible with ODbL and OSM? These are not common addr tags:
There's no need to have two phone tags:
|
|
| 162082147 | Thanks! I just changed the conditional accordingly |
|
| 162081859 | Da habe ich auch keine gute Idee. Ich hatte den Weg nur editiert weil er außerdem noch ein anderes Tag hatte, das da nicht hingehört: |
|
| 162041979 | Hi,
are proper tags for streets in OSM. The only correct form is
|
|
| 162017278 | If there is a consensus to add tags this way, it might be helpful. If only you use these tags its not: Others searching for this event will look for "Chido" in the value of a "damage:event" tag, which doesn't exist on these buildings. |
|
| 162017278 | Hi,
|
|
| 161972973 | Hi,
|
|
| 131050038 | Da kann ich wenig dazu sagen, ich hatte hier nur einen Tippfehler korrigiert. Wenn sich Leute dafür interessieren könnten, kann man das Objekt sicher auch noch länger in OSM lassen damit es gefunden wird, inklusive dem Verweis auf den neuen Standort. Falsch ist das Löschen aber auch nicht. |
|
| 161968574 | Hi Simon,
|
|
| 161936440 | Hi,
Wie das Wiki schreibt ist "greenland" etwas problematisch, weil es nicht die momentane Nutzung beschreibt wie ein übliches "landuse". Mit dem "planned" Prefix haben wir ein gängies Tagging, das sowohl den jetzigen als auch den zukünftigen Status erfasst. |
|
| 161768553 | The idea of the tag as I wrote it is that it is indeed open 24/7. The second part defines it do be "open" at any time, just with additional note that no staff is present. If there is a larger interest in explicitly tagging "hours staff is present for any kind of help or consultation" we can think about properly defining the new tag, but as long as it is only this one station I would use the common opening_hours. |
|
| 160237777 | Right. I'll fix that later. |
|
| 161873090 | Hi,
|
|
| 151104523 | Hi,
While the regulation obviously depends on the left/right half of the road, I think backward/forward is the closest we can get to in OSM using existing tags. |
|
| 161528716 | According to wikipedia the standard is
The spelling "socket:j563-B" with a minor letter fits to the other j-Standards we already have like socket:j3105-2 |
|
| 161800804 | Reminder:
Please make sure you use the correct tags for these:
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. |
|
| 161771325 | Could you check this way, it got two strange tags:
|
|
| 161776907 | I don't see anything special on the (mostly English) signs the wiki article contains. The destination:arrow tags in the wiki are only helpful if we know the orientation of the sign (unless you want to tag the sign only without relating it to any way close by) What do you mean by "aren't oriented to cardinals directions"? They need to point in some direction to be useful, and the key we use is one of the eight cardinal directions that is closest to the direction the sign points to. |
|
| 161768553 | Hi,
You could use opening_hours for this, like
|
|
| 161776907 | Hi,
I'd rather suggest to use the "direction_north" tagging scheme - Without the orientation of the sign it is difficult to correctly interpret the direction these arrows are pointing to. |