OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
161107772

I'm very well able to understand what was written there, but it doesn't describe the common tagging practice. On a highway, the 'name' tag refers to the name of the highway and 'bridge:name' is the name of the bridge if it is not mapped separately. There's nothing about which name is more prominently shown on signs.

168107436

Hi,
could you explain what these two tags mean? They are not in use in other places:
monitoring:emergency
monitoring:politial

168029735

Hi,
the hydrants got a strange tag "storz=false" - could you check that?

166908834

Bitte lass die Tags so wie im Wiki beschrieben.
Bitte erst dort diskutieren und einen Konsens finden.

168039553

Hallo,
kannst du statt electric_vehicle:description einfach das traffic_sign angeben? Dann wäre das sauber erfasst und auswertbar.

167933503

Thanks!
'maxaxleweight' is per axle. The limit here is a 'maxweight:conditional'.
There are already several in the database like

maxweight:conditional = 18 @ (bogie:axles = 2); 24 @ (bogie:axles = 3)

167933503

Hi,
I'm confused about these tags. Why is the axle load so much higher for double and triple axles? That means a truck with triple axle can be six times as heavy as one with a single axle? Or is this the maxweight, in case of a triple axle?

167890123

Wenn du eine Diskussion möchtest, führe sie bitte im Forum. Changeset Kommentare sind dafür wahrlich nicht geeignet.

167890123

Die Definition im Wiki ist eindeutig, und auch logisch passt das.

marker=aerial ist nur der Teil, der für die Sichtbarkeit sorgt. Der Pfosten ist nicht Teil davon und wird extra beschrieben.

Bei einem Briefkasten taggst du ja auch nicht colour=yellow;silver, weil er auf einem Metallpfosten steht.

Bitte verwende die Tags, wie sie vorgeschlagen, diskutiert, abgestimmt und akzeptiert wurden. Wenn du da eine Änderung möchtest, braucht es eine weitere Diskussion und Übereinkunft.

167893360

Hi,
you added three new keys for seemingly the same thing, the planned phases of construction. Could you decide on one?
development:phase
development_phase
ref:development

167860146

It looks like there is no need for an additional tag here. At the point of the traffic_signals node you can't turn right anyhow - the ways already split 20 meters further west.
The particular design with one common light for all lanes is just a design choice of the street planner - and we currently don't have any tags for such a detailed description.

167860146

It seems ChatGPT told you something wrong. "traffic_signal:direction" is just about the direction of travel along the road, not about turning.

Do you have a photo of these traffic lights, then I might be able to help.

167860146

Hi,
"traffic_signals:direction:right=arrow" is not yet used anywhere. What does it mean?

167890123

Hallo,
die marker=aerial haben hier Tags die es sonst nicht gibt, und die anscheinend nicht nötig sind.

colour und material sind die Tags für den von oben sichtbaren Teil.
Die Form könnte man in marker:shape packen.

support, support:material, support:colour beschreiben den Pfosten an dem es befestigt ist.

167822851

Please don't delete tags like 'ele', just because they are not commonly used. They still serve their purpose.
Please also have a look at the description of the 'name' key - such generic descriptions are not to be tagged.

167822851

Hi,
thanks for the reply!

- The 'ele' tag can be added to any point, not just peaks.
- 'moutain_pass' is misspelled.
- '(Pas)' is for sure not a proper name and should not be in the name tag.

167822851

Hi,
could you explain this change?
node/10672746368

You removed the 'ele' and 'natural' tag and added a strange "moutain_pass" tag.

167785530

Hi,
something went wrong here. All of this data are duplicates of existing features.
This happens if you load a geojson or similar file into JOSM and then try to upload it. You have to load data directly from the API or Overpass - every other way will lead to duplicates and not to editing the already existing objects.

I reverted these changes.

167575923

Welcome to OSM!
Please don't just dump any data from external sources into the OSM database.
It is necessary that any import of data follows our import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

167408951

The proposal was made and left inactive. There was no discussion or rejection. The tag is in use for a decade now - although the number of uses is still low.