Hi, it wouldn't be for the landowner to specify which paths are public or private, Scottish public access rights would apply to many of the paths and roads. Perhaps some might be exempt eg immediately around the house but only tag access=private if that's obvious on the ground. https://www.ramblers.org.uk/go-walking-hub/simple-guide-scottish-access-rights

Sorry, missed that - now sorted

Hi @tree_squad, I've removed the tourism=camp_site tag because this isn't a place where people can camp overnight with tents, motorhomes or caravans. I think it's a yurt so I've tagged it as a building=ger; please feel free to tag it better if you wish. Wiki links for these tags:
tourism=camp_site
building=ger

Hi, I'm removing the access=no tag you added because access= is about legal restrictions which do not apply here. The track is also passable on foot (it was about 2 weeks ago anyway), so I've adjusted smoothness to very_horrible

Hi,
Yes I remember this one (2 years ago). When I walked this 2 years ago it was mostly too narrow to drive a car/landrover along so no longer a track. It had recently been resurfaced about 5ft wide with a good quality gravel surface - that would make it a path. But it is signed at either end as part of a cycle loop so I chose highway=cycleway and surface=gravel.
All OK?
Cheers

Hi, I moved the name from way/48076622/history to a new route relation because that's a better way to tag a route name, I don't know anything about the Sutherland Trail itself, didn't see any signs when I was in the area and have no objection to you deleting it (but the original tagger might)

Apologies, assumed it was a mistake and gate not visible in air photo - have now restored the gate too.

Hi jamesks, this changeset seems to have broken a lot of multipolygons I created to map the land use around Brahan and Moy Woods (around here osm.org/#map=14/57.5710/-4.5234).
Please could you fix?

fixed

Good point, agreed, done.

I visited in person and discovered that camping was not possible - it is only open to people renting a pitch long term. Can you suggest a better tag combination?

No sorry, I didn't have time to go down Windmill Road.

Yes you're right, all I did was re-tag 113081869 to put it underground. Feel free to delete one.

Oops. JOSM crashed during upload, I thought I had resolved conflicts correctly but clearly not.
Think I have fixed most of the duplicates now.

None of these are campsites, they are just laybys beside the road. I don't think they should appear on OpenStreetMap.

Didn't spot that when I was there because OsmAnd doesn't render natural=cave. I don't think there is a cave there, it's up a steep wooded bank, but I can't be sure.

Yes that probably is the reason it's been tagged as a nature reserve. So the follow on question is does the boundary of a Regional Park need to appear on a general purpose map? Other landscape designations e.g. national scenic areas, forest parks don't seem to appear (and/or have not been mapped).

I don't think the Pentland Hills Regional Park is a leisure=nature_reserve, as it is not managed primarily for conservation. I think boundary=protected_area and protection_class=7 is enough.

Thanks for comment - I've checked osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtrack and I think you're right. Have fixed this one and some others nearby.

Well spotted, thanks. These roads are open for non motorised users so I have corrected the access tags to reflect this.