In OSM, the name=* tag must contain the current and official or commonly used name of the object.
The value you used seems a description

In OSM, the name=* tag must contain the current and official or commonly used name of the object.
“Ex casermetta” isn't a name; it's a historical description.

The tag name should be set to a real name, the value you set where did you find it?

Hi, please use more descriptive comments, they help those who map after you.

Hi, please use more descriptive comments, they help those who map after you.

Hi, please use more descriptive comments, they help those who map after you.

Hi, please use more descriptive comments, they help those who map after you.

Hi, please use more descriptive comments, they help those who map after you.

Hi, please use more descriptive comments, they help those who map after you.

Thanks so much for the information. I think you're doing a great job. I'd suggest adding a short comment in the "note=*" tag of the relevant "relations" to inform future mappers that the "Via Alpina" situation is evolving from the old to the new. Bye, and happy mapping.

Sei sicuro che siano tutte traduzioni scorrette?

Great, thank you so much!
I appreciate your proactivity in verifying the information on the official website.
If it's more convenient for you, you can contact me at this email address: MicheleOSM3@gmail.com

Ciao Lorenzo,
grazie di avermi risposto.
Avevo già aperto una discussione sul forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mappatura-sicai-ciclo/139843

Per non appesantire la discussione qui, ti invito a partecipare alla discussione sul forum.

Mi piacerebbe se tu partecipassi.

Hi, thanks for the clarification.

Just to be sure, are you doing remote mapping, i.e., without hiking the trails in person? If so, I’d like to mention a couple of points based on OSM best practices:

The Hiking mapping guidelines
recommend mapping what is actually on the ground. Remote mapping without additional reliable sources can sometimes lead to inaccuracies—not necessarily in geometry, but in attributes or trail status.

Leaving old route relations unchanged can be confusing for hikers, especially if the trail has been updated.

I don’t have many opportunities to check trail markings on the ground, but this summer I’ll likely pass through some sections in my region (North-East Italy). In addition, I can verify the geometry remotely using aerial imagery and LiDAR data for my region. I’d be happy to help with that.

Quali sono le fonti del nome "Percorso Quattro Venti" ?

Hi, by "AV-R1" do you mean "VA-R1"?
Anyway, if the "Via Alpina" project has been renewed, it would be a good idea to clean up the old "Via Alpina" as well. If you need help, I'm here to help.
Will the new "Via Alpina" have signs and trail markers on the ground?

Ciao, perché hai messo il name "Sentiero dell'amicizia" su n way invece di creare una relation per il sentiero?

i codici sentiero andrebbero sulle relation e non sulle way. Il commento "SOTA" non è informativo su quello che hai fatto.

Scusami, ma perché continui a mettere i nomi dei sentieri sulle way? Dovrebbero essere sulle relation.
Inoltre commenti come "UUOUOUO" sono inappropriati, i commenti dovrebbero informare i mappatori su quello che hai fatto.

I'd just like to remove the trails that aren't marked on the ground. The Alpe Adria Trails are all marked on the ground. The JKAT trails are also marked on the ground, or at least the CAI will mark them. These are the JKAT trails that the CAI wants to keep and that I won't delete: http://trailsfvg.42web.io/GC/Map.html?settore=JKAT&map=mapy&title=Lista+sentieri+-+Settore%2FGruppo%3A+JKAT